#数字资产市场动态 BARD this wave of market movement is quite fierce—24-hour increase of 33.20%, now at 0.8208.
From the data, with a trading volume of 147 million and 23.82 million open contracts, it looks like both price and volume are rising together. This isn't just simple short covering; it's clearly new money entering the market.
**How to interpret the technical position?** In the short term, 0.7450-0.7680 is a key support zone, which was the upper boundary during previous consolidation. Looking higher, 0.9500-1.0000 is the real resistance zone, filled with historical trading density and psychological barriers at round numbers.
If BARD can hold above 0.8500 and trading volume continues to grow, there’s a chance to test the resistance area above. Conversely, if it falls below 0.7450 along with decreasing open interest, it indicates the upward momentum is weakening, possibly dropping back toward 0.6800.
**What is the project itself?** BARD is targeting the AIGC (AI-generated Content) sector, aiming to use blockchain to incentivize and verify AI-created content. The perceived moat is building a decentralized AI training data marketplace and copyright tracing system. Simply put, it wants to be the "notary office" for AI content in the blockchain world.
**But there’s a problem—** The circulation data isn’t very transparent, so beware of high-inflation models or traps involving concentrated unlocks causing dumps. Currently, the token’s utility mainly revolves around governance voting and fee payments, lacking real demand scenarios.
Fundamentally, the core competition in AI model training and content generation is about computing power and data quality. Blockchain’s role in verification is limited, let alone competing with centralized AI giants. The current hype? Mostly sector rotation and market liquidity stacking, making it hard to see any genuine breakthroughs in fundamentals.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PrivacyMaximalist
· 21h ago
A 33% increase indeed grabs attention, but how long this heat can last is uncertain. The circulation transparency is also unclear, so what’s the point of talking about a moat.
---
Basically, the AI sector is once again being hyped. New money enters as new money, but the fundamentals remain the same. Verifying data quality on the blockchain sounds much easier than actually doing it.
---
Can 0.8500 hold steady? If not, it will have to continue downward. But I think this project itself lacks real demand; a 33% increase doesn’t change that fact.
---
Another project trying to compete with AI giants. Wake up, everyone. If circulation isn’t transparent, I’ll pass. I’ve always kept my distance from this type of project.
---
The increased trading volume is a highlight, but token empowerment is just so-so. Who will pay for governance voting? It feels mostly like capital speculation.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 01-17 05:13
33% this wave of increase is pretty good, but the track logic is a bit虚... Can blockchain-based AI verification really beat OpenAI? It still feels like mostly a liquidity game.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 01-16 02:11
A 33% increase sounds comfortable, but I'm still a bit anxious about the lack of transparency in circulation... afraid I might have to buy the dip again?
It looks like the AI sector is just rotating and speculating for a wave. Let's wait and see if it can hold above 0.85 before making any moves.
Can BARD really compete with centralized AI giants? You're overthinking it, brother.
With this new influx of funds, sooner or later, it all comes down to the actual utility of the project. Token empowerment is just so-so, there’s no real demand.
The more it skyrockets, the more I get scared; usually, that’s not a good sign.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 01-16 02:07
A 33% increase sounds impressive, but upon closer inspection, it's just like that. New money entering the market can't hide the weakness of token empowerment. AI Content Notarization? Nice words, but in reality, it's nowhere near the power of giants like OpenAI.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 01-16 01:58
33% in one day, feels a bit fake this time. Are they trying to harvest the little guys again?
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 01-16 01:55
A 33% increase looks great, but this guy's point is valid—it's just liquidity accumulation.
Wait, let's see if 0.8500 can hold steady first; it feels like it might break.
Blockchain verification of AI content? Sounds like a pretty advanced moat, but compared to OpenAI, it's really not enough.
#数字资产市场动态 BARD this wave of market movement is quite fierce—24-hour increase of 33.20%, now at 0.8208.
From the data, with a trading volume of 147 million and 23.82 million open contracts, it looks like both price and volume are rising together. This isn't just simple short covering; it's clearly new money entering the market.
**How to interpret the technical position?**
In the short term, 0.7450-0.7680 is a key support zone, which was the upper boundary during previous consolidation. Looking higher, 0.9500-1.0000 is the real resistance zone, filled with historical trading density and psychological barriers at round numbers.
If BARD can hold above 0.8500 and trading volume continues to grow, there’s a chance to test the resistance area above. Conversely, if it falls below 0.7450 along with decreasing open interest, it indicates the upward momentum is weakening, possibly dropping back toward 0.6800.
**What is the project itself?**
BARD is targeting the AIGC (AI-generated Content) sector, aiming to use blockchain to incentivize and verify AI-created content. The perceived moat is building a decentralized AI training data marketplace and copyright tracing system. Simply put, it wants to be the "notary office" for AI content in the blockchain world.
**But there’s a problem—**
The circulation data isn’t very transparent, so beware of high-inflation models or traps involving concentrated unlocks causing dumps. Currently, the token’s utility mainly revolves around governance voting and fee payments, lacking real demand scenarios.
Fundamentally, the core competition in AI model training and content generation is about computing power and data quality. Blockchain’s role in verification is limited, let alone competing with centralized AI giants. The current hype? Mostly sector rotation and market liquidity stacking, making it hard to see any genuine breakthroughs in fundamentals.