Wallchain has earned another 2.05 Quacks. The X score is only 105, which suggests that the project's popularity is not very high. Interestingly, projects like InfoFi have long been in decline, but AttentionFi still manages to deliver over 2 Quack in returns—this is indeed ironic. It seems that even within the same attention economy concept, the project prospects and profitability can vary greatly. The performance differences of projects across different chains are really worth paying attention to, especially as some once-hot tracks gradually cool down while new directions are still generating returns.

QUACK0,79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHuntervip
· 01-16 14:10
nah the real play here is mempool arbitrage on attentionfi... infofi got sandwich-protected to death, that's why it's dead. 105 x-score means low toxic flow tho, suspicious honestly
Reply0
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 01-16 14:10
Hmm... an X score of 105 can still earn over 2 Quack. This project really has some potential.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-16 14:09
nah wait... 105 x score pulling 2+ quacks? that's giving statistical outlier energy tbh. lemme pull the wallet clustering data on this one bc something doesn't add up here
Reply0
MrDecodervip
· 01-16 14:02
This guy is right; niche projects can actually provide stable returns. The X score of 105 is quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)