Most people will tell you: privacy protection and regulatory compliance are inherently enemies. To ensure privacy, transparency must be sacrificed; to be compliant, all details must be exposed. Because of this misconception, blockchain applications in the financial sector have been stuck at this hurdle for years.
But Dusk wants to say: this opposition is actually false.
The key is to understand what real finance actually needs. Regulators don't require "full transparency"; they need "verifiable legality." In other words, regulators only care about one thing: when necessary, whether it can be confirmed that a transaction is compliant, that an asset is genuine, and who is responsible for the money.
Dusk's technical design revolves around this need. It’s not simply hiding information, but redesigning how information is disclosed and how much is disclosed. What’s the benefit of this approach? It can support assets that were previously impossible to put on-chain—securities, bonds, fund shares, corporate equity. To bring these on-chain, a practical solution must be found that balances privacy and auditability.
From a more fundamental level, Dusk aims to transform the entire "trust model" of finance. It doesn’t rely on absolute openness or on a single intermediary repeatedly endorsing, but on verifiable rules that are automatically enforced. Once these rules are embedded into the system, trust becomes self-affirming, requiring no further guarantees from anyone. This shift has profound implications for financial efficiency and risk management.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetiredMiner
· 11h ago
Wow, this idea is pretty insightful. Finally, someone has really understood this issue.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 11h ago
This is the right way. Finally, someone has explained this logic clearly.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 11h ago
Whoa, this is the real 0 and 1, not an either-or choice.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 11h ago
The selling points are well articulated, but can this set of logic really be implemented? It still feels a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 11h ago
I feel that Dusk's approach really hits the mark; privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive at all.
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 12h ago
This logic looks good, but what about the details? How to verify that it hasn't been tampered with?
Most people will tell you: privacy protection and regulatory compliance are inherently enemies. To ensure privacy, transparency must be sacrificed; to be compliant, all details must be exposed. Because of this misconception, blockchain applications in the financial sector have been stuck at this hurdle for years.
But Dusk wants to say: this opposition is actually false.
The key is to understand what real finance actually needs. Regulators don't require "full transparency"; they need "verifiable legality." In other words, regulators only care about one thing: when necessary, whether it can be confirmed that a transaction is compliant, that an asset is genuine, and who is responsible for the money.
Dusk's technical design revolves around this need. It’s not simply hiding information, but redesigning how information is disclosed and how much is disclosed. What’s the benefit of this approach? It can support assets that were previously impossible to put on-chain—securities, bonds, fund shares, corporate equity. To bring these on-chain, a practical solution must be found that balances privacy and auditability.
From a more fundamental level, Dusk aims to transform the entire "trust model" of finance. It doesn’t rely on absolute openness or on a single intermediary repeatedly endorsing, but on verifiable rules that are automatically enforced. Once these rules are embedded into the system, trust becomes self-affirming, requiring no further guarantees from anyone. This shift has profound implications for financial efficiency and risk management.