2026-01-19 00:28:29

The handling of the FLOW project really leaves people confused. Price plummeting? Blame it on market conditions. Hacked? Framed as a technical issue. Investors losing everything? Turn around and tell you that you should bear the risk — we've all seen this kind of rhetoric.

But the problem is, before the hacking incident occurred, this team had already been eroding investors' value. From a peak of $46 down to $0.07, it's hard to say this is just a market cycle. When the real crisis broke out, their first reaction was not to think about how to protect investors, but to safeguard their own systems and interests.

Now, the token has been listed on risk monitoring lists by mainstream trading platforms, which in turn indicates what — chaotic governance, risk management being a sham, and the team's credibility already exhausted. Watching this series of operations, it's indeed very difficult to hold any expectations for this project.

FLOW-2,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CantAffordPancake

· 9h ago

Falling from $46 to $0.07, this isn't a cycle, it's outright exploitation. --- It's the same trick again—first protect yourself, then talk about investor risks. Truly clever. --- The governance is so chaotic that it's been called out by the exchanges. What more is there to look forward to? --- Hacker attacks, market trends, risk bearing... a set of clichés one after another. Everyone's tired of hearing it. --- It's $0.07 now, and you're still putting on a show. --- It's been eroding value for a long time; hackers are just the last straw that broke the camel's back. --- Overstretched credibility—those four words say it all. There's really nothing more to say. --- This team truly treats investors like fools. --- From peak to trough, talking about market cycles? That's a load of nonsense. --- Being listed as a risk is the most honest evaluation.

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 9h ago

$46 dropped to 0.07, this isn't called a market cycle, this is called cutting leeks. --- The team first protects their own interests before talking about investors, this move is absolutely brilliant. --- The risk list is already up, and some people are still buying the dip? I just don't understand. --- Hacker attacks, technical issues, bearing risks... these excuses are really old and ridiculous. --- Public trust has been exhausted to this extent, can there still be a comeback? I think it's unlikely. --- From peak to floor, who would believe it's a cycle? --- Being added to the risk monitoring list basically confirms death. --- The governance chaos has reached such a level that they should have run away long ago, what are they still packaging here?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSage

· 10h ago

From 46 to 0.07, this is not a cycle, it's murder. --- Same old rhetoric, hackers, market, risk assumed—hearing it so much it’s become numb. --- It’s obvious already, the team’s first instinct to protect themselves means they’ve already lost. --- Now on the risk list, is anyone still buying in? --- Feels like FLOW is textbook-level self-destructive behavior. --- Governance chaos? No, this is organized leek-cutting. --- Falling from $46 to $0.07 and still talking about cycles, hilarious. --- All trading platforms are marked in red, what does that mean? It means these people should get out. --- The first reaction to every crisis is to protect their own wallets, truly impressive. --- Public trust being overdrawn is just polite talk, to be blunt—scammers have been exposed.

View OriginalReply0