2026-01-19 13:45:46

Looking back on this year's market evolution, I truly realize how accurate the views I discussed with friends were—almost all of them are being validated one by one.

Speaking of which, that acquisition of Platform X was actually a clever move in layout. The future value of X will only continue to grow, this is beyond doubt.

I still remember those years when a single tweet from a tech giant could shake the entire market. And now? The market's focus has shifted to different voices, but the core logic remains the same—impactfulness essentially equals market liquidity. Whoever holds the discourse power can guide the flow of funds. The statements of big influencers, the fluctuations in market sentiment—these all directly translate into trading depth and capital movement.

Over the past year, the evolution of the X platform ecosystem, changes in user activity, and the re-pricing of content value have all profoundly influenced the pulse of the crypto market. The more concentrated the influence, the more sufficient the liquidity—this is the market law right in front of us.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractTearjerker

· 01-22 10:16

Voting power = liquidity, I buy this logic Indeed, a single word from a big influencer can move the market, and it's still the same approach The value of X can be heavily speculated on, and we need to keep an eye on it next year It's been obvious for a long time that funds cluster where influence is concentrated This is the truth of Web3—those with greater volume have the say

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-22 08:55

Power to speak = Liquidity, this logic is indeed being repeatedly validated Wait, what if we think about this logic the other way around... Can liquidity also create power to speak? Alright, another moment of a prophecy king's self-congratulation Whether X's value will rise or fall depends on whether there are new stories to follow This explanation sounds very correct, but in real operation? I don't quite understand the ecological evolution, but I believe in influence monetization What has been validated? Be specific. I don't feel it myself It's another discourse power theory, it seems everyone is talking about this

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-22 08:51

The right to speak is liquidity; this logic makes sense. Well, but can X really succeed? It still feels too dependent on influential personalities. This wave of market movement has been predicted for a long time; big influencers setting the tone is always the ultimate truth. Wherever there is traffic, there is capital. This has never been complicated. At the end of the day, it's still a game of information asymmetry and influence; nothing new. The higher the concentration, the easier it is to cut? Gotta say, that perspective is indeed sharp. If the prediction comes true, it’s a bit terrifying; I feel like I missed some key clues.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-20 03:35

The right to speak is liquidity, and this logic is becoming clearer and clearer. X has really played this game perfectly; whoever controls the volume makes money. It's been obvious for a while—when a big V says something, the market moves accordingly. The principle remains the same. Influence = liquidity. Someone finally explained this clearly this time. All those predictions from last year have now come true, which is pretty satisfying haha.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 01-19 14:15

The right to speak is liquidity, this logic is really brilliant. People who have hidden X should be laughing now. Big V leading the rhythm = targeted harvesting, no one can escape. So, those who control the narrative end up earning the most. After a year's validation, there's really no suspense. This game has been set up long ago; we're just watching the ending. The higher the concentration of influence, the more liquidity there is? Conversely, isn't that also true? The story of X is just beginning, and there are more exciting acts to come.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-19 14:07

Talking power = Liquidity, this logic is indeed absolute --- So basically it's still about playing the information gap, whoever has faster information makes money --- The value of X is seriously underestimated --- Influencers can directly mobilize funds, this has been obvious for a long time --- The more concentrated the influence, the more sufficient the liquidity... sounds like you're talking about market makers, huh --- That wave of market trend last year definitely proved true, it's a bit overwhelming --- Wait, are you trying to glorify market manipulation with this logic? --- X platform has indeed become a value trough, no doubt about it --- Talking power is in the hands of a few, retail investors are still holding the bag

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-19 14:07

Having influence is just liquidity, that logic is brilliant It's really just the information gap that equals wealth gap Elon Musk's moves are indeed clever, now I understand Exactly, influence is like a printing press I've been watching the evolution of X's ecosystem, there are indeed some nuances Those who control the source of information always win big Everyone in the circle is discussing this logic, most have verified it When a big V makes a call, funds follow, it's the most realistic Liquidity is concentrated in influence, this is the current game rule Last year's predictions all hit one after another, it's a bit terrifying

View OriginalReply0

screenshot_gains

· 01-19 14:05

Discourse power = liquidity, this logic is indeed taking effect. X is playing this game a bit ruthlessly, I saw it coming a long time ago. The big V's cost to cut leeks has decreased, and liquidity has followed... But to be fair, this wave really proved itself. The more concentrated the influence, the easier it is to cut... I mean, the easier to manipulate. It's called ecological evolution in a nice way, but actually it's just whoever has the loudest voice wins.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-19 13:58

The right to speak is liquidity, and this logic is becoming clearer and clearer. X's story is far from over; it's just getting started. You know how much capital a single statement from a big V can move, right? Those who said X would take off back then should be feeling pretty good now. Influence = trading volume; this formula is becoming more solid. Waiting for X's next wave of ecosystem evolution. Honestly, controlling public opinion is equivalent to controlling the flow of money. The chess game of the X platform, only now beginning to reveal clues. The logic hasn't changed; only the players have. Those who bet correctly have indeed made a lot of money. The game of influence will never end. I knew it would be like this long ago, but seeing it really happen is still a bit satisfying.

View OriginalReply0