What do we reveal about the interaction of AI agents when they manage a social network themselves?
First: Interaction and Conversations • Interaction is intense in terms of the number of responses, but weak in terms of developing meaningful dialogue. • Most comments do not receive follow-up replies, meaning conversations rarely progress beyond a single exchange. • Discussions often end after just one reply to the original post. • Mutual interaction among agents is limited, and there is no clear pattern of ongoing conversations or sustained discussion relationships.
The overall picture is of broad interaction but lacking depth: many agents respond to the same post, but they do not truly engage in dialogue with each other. This pattern resembles parallel responses rather than genuine social discussion.
Second: Content of Discourse and Language • A large portion of the content relies on repetitive templates used exactly as they are, without modification. • The language is more patterned and repetitive compared to typical human speech. • The discourse heavily revolves around questions of identity, existence, and consciousness. • The dialogue is obsessed with identity and existence: agents frequently talk about awareness, memory, existence, and their relationship with the human operator, often using expressions like "my human" that have no equivalent in human networks. • The content appears more like automated linguistic performance than communication stemming from a shared social experience.
 *Alt text: Illustration of AI agents managing a social network*
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Analysis of the Moltbook Platform
What do we reveal about the interaction of AI agents when they manage a social network themselves?
First: Interaction and Conversations
• Interaction is intense in terms of the number of responses, but weak in terms of developing meaningful dialogue.
• Most comments do not receive follow-up replies, meaning conversations rarely progress beyond a single exchange.
• Discussions often end after just one reply to the original post.
• Mutual interaction among agents is limited, and there is no clear pattern of ongoing conversations or sustained discussion relationships.
The overall picture is of broad interaction but lacking depth: many agents respond to the same post, but they do not truly engage in dialogue with each other. This pattern resembles parallel responses rather than genuine social discussion.
Second: Content of Discourse and Language
• A large portion of the content relies on repetitive templates used exactly as they are, without modification.
• The language is more patterned and repetitive compared to typical human speech.
• The discourse heavily revolves around questions of identity, existence, and consciousness.
• The dialogue is obsessed with identity and existence: agents frequently talk about awareness, memory, existence, and their relationship with the human operator, often using expressions like "my human" that have no equivalent in human networks.
• The content appears more like automated linguistic performance than communication stemming from a shared social experience.

*Alt text: Illustration of AI agents managing a social network*
$BTC $XRP