Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The US Treasury Secretary has rejected the idea of banks being forced to buy Bitcoin
At a congressional hearing, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent clearly defined the boundaries of the U.S. financial agency’s authority regarding cryptocurrency policy. He explicitly stated that federal authorities will not use any coercive mechanisms to compel commercial banks to increase their digital asset holdings during market instability.
The question raised by California Congressman Brad Sherman of the Democratic Party concerned the possibility of the Treasury intervening in market processes. Sherman asked whether the secretary plans to use existing tools to stimulate banks’ demand for crypto assets, including meme coins associated with political figures. He also inquired about the potential revision of banking reserve standards to promote digital asset purchases.
Firm stance on jurisdiction boundaries
The secretary’s response was as clear as possible. Bessent emphasized that he does not have the tools for such actions, including those available to him as Chair of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). In fact, such measures would be outside his official duties and contradict federal policy.
Confiscated assets: scope and strategic role
During his speech, the minister reported a significant increase in the value of assets seized and under U.S. control. Over the storage period, the value of confiscated reserves has grown by more than $15 billion, confirming the potential of these assets as part of the national reserve. However, this does not change the official position on methods of portfolio replenishment.
According to an order signed by the president earlier this year, the United States has gained legal tools to expand its strategic digital asset reserves, but only through specific channels. Replenishment is only possible via court orders for confiscation or by transforming other government reserves—such as oil or precious metals—into cryptocurrency. The open market remains excluded from the procurement strategy, Bessent emphasized.
Position on central bank digital currency: a matter of necessity
Earlier, the secretary expressed his view on the prospects for creating a digital dollar by the Federal Reserve. In his opinion, a government digital currency can only be considered a necessary measure in the absence of adequate alternatives to basic assets. This position reflects skepticism about the need to develop a national cryptocurrency in the current context.
Thus, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury demonstrated a commitment to a clear separation between government regulation and market mechanisms in the field of crypto assets.