Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just read a very interesting analysis about Middle East politics. According to scholar Bernard Haykel, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia has a clear stance against the Iranian regime, but the situation is much more complex than it appears at first glance.
What caught my attention was this: despite the declared aversion, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia is genuinely concerned about the consequences of a possible collapse of Iran. It may seem contradictory, but it makes sense when you think about regional dynamics. A weakened or completely collapsed Iran could destabilize the entire balance of power that Saudi Arabia has worked to maintain.
Bloomberg highlighted that this is precisely the issue that keeps Saudi leaders awake at night. If Iran were to become a failed state, the geopolitical repercussions would be unpredictable. We're talking about regional security, trade flows, strategic influence. The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia needs to navigate this tightrope constantly.
It's a reminder of how international politics is about risk calculation, not just ideological preferences. What do you think about this dynamic?