The New York Times reports that Adam Back might be Satoshi Nakamoto based on circumstantial evidence...


Specifically:
- The citation of Hashcash in the Bitcoin whitepaper,
- The early electronic money proposals (1997-1999),
- Linguistic similarities and his "silence" between 2008 and 2011.
A large-scale text analysis ranked him among the main suspects, but stylistic results were inconclusive, and no direct evidence exists.
Adam Back himself denies this claim, calling it a "coincidence," and has refused to provide the key metadata of his emails.
⚠️ Find all the clues regarding Adam Back, as well as other suspects, in MY LATEST BOOK "On the Trail of Satoshi Nakamoto," available on AMAZON (link in description) 📙
BTC-0,9%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin