Many people say they oppose spammers, but few systems truly address this issue.

Most platform problems are not due to a lack of good content, but because good content and low-quality content are subject to the same distribution rules.
The result is that bad money drives out good money.
Recently, I’ve been looking at @RallyOnChain's updates, and there is a change I find very critical.
Minimum Sorsa Score.
Simply put, if you do not meet a certain quality threshold, you are not even eligible for distribution.
The significance of this is not in filtering, but in rebuilding the incentive structure.
When low-quality content cannot enter the reward pool, the entire system’s focus will shift back to the content itself.
Adding the Max Winners limit further ensures that rewards are no longer diluted but concentrated on truly valuable content.
This is completely different from many platforms.
Others are amplifying traffic; Rally is compressing garbage.
This is what a mature content market should do.
It’s not about involving more people in sharing the pie, but about ensuring the pie is only shared with those who truly deserve it.