Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
Gate MCP
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just saw some very important news from the New York Federal Court - Uniswap Labs and CEO Hayden Adams just scored a major victory as the entire class-action lawsuit against them was dismissed with full legal effect.
This started in 2022 when an investor named Nessa Risley and several others accused of losing money trading scam tokens through Uniswap. They claimed that Uniswap Labs intentionally facilitated fraudulent activities and pump-and-dump schemes. The case has lasted nearly four years, with the plaintiffs continuously amending their complaint in an attempt to find some legal basis.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla ultimately dismissed all remaining claims on March 2, 2026. The reason was very clear: the plaintiffs could not prove that Uniswap Labs had actual knowledge of specific scams or provided significant support for fraudulent behavior. The court stated that merely providing a platform does not mean participating in fraud.
What’s interesting here is that the court was very explicit: general warnings on social media about scam tokens, even a study from March 2022 on the high rate of scam tokens, do not prove that Uniswap knew in advance about the specific tokens traders were dealing with. Uniswap also never activated the optional fee toggle, and the interface fee was implemented after the relevant timeframe.
This is truly a landmark ruling for the entire DeFi space. It clearly establishes that the design of decentralized infrastructure does not inherently mean organizing fraud. Protocol developers are not responsible for what users do with their tools, as long as they have no direct knowledge and do not actively support malicious activities.
Hayden Adams wrote on X that this is a reasonable outcome — if you write open-source smart contract code, and scammers use it, they are responsible, not the developers. Brian Nistler, the General Counsel of the Uniswap Foundation, called this a precedent-setting decision for DeFi.
Overall, this is a positive signal for DeFi projects and protocol developers. It shows that federal courts are refusing to extend legal liability infinitely. Concerns about regulatory gaps in DeFi can be better addressed by Congress rather than through court rulings.