👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
Jump Trading requests court to relocate Terraform lawsuit to California
Jump Trading, a leading trading company specializing in high-frequency and algorithmic trading approaches, seeks to move a lawsuit accusing it of manipulating the prices of Terraform’s stablecoin from Illinois to California. The company justifies this motion based on the grounds of expediency and practicality.
In a motion filed on June 9, Jump Trading presented its argument to the presiding judge in Illinois, contending that the lawsuit would be better served through consolidation with a separate ongoing case involving Nick Patterson and Terraform Labs in California’s Northern District. The motion emphasizes the synergy that could arise from combining these related legal proceedings.
Notably, Jump Trading’s case originated from a class action lawsuit initiated by Kim, a resident of New Jersey, represented by a California and New York-based law firm. However, the lawsuit was filed in an Illinois federal court.
The company highlights that the ongoing lawsuit is not the first legal action concerning the collapse of Terraform Labs. Multiple parties have already been engaged in litigation surrounding the same issue in the Patterson vs. Terraform Labs case in California. In light of this, Jump Trading seeks to consolidate its case with the Patterson lawsuit.
You might also like:
Do Kwon to face multiple jail terms in South Korea and US By seeking consolidation of the lawsuits, Jump Trading contends that it would be in the best interest of justice and convenience. This approach would effectively prevent unnecessary repetition of discovery, testimony, and briefing processes while reducing the likelihood of disparate rulings based on identical facts.
Jump Trading argues that the case lacks any substantial connection to Illinois, making retaining it within the state unnecessary. Moreover, all the witnesses and the required documents can be readily accessed outside the state. The firm also points out that Kim, who initiated the first class action, is a nonresident of Illinois. Kim is also part of the Patterson lawsuit in California.
Jump Trading entangled in the Terra saga
Earlier this year, the relationship between Jump Trading and Terraform Labs gained significant attention when the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) formally filed charges against Terraform Labs due to the collapse of the Terra eco.
Filed in February, the SEC’s charges allege that a “masked trading firm” manipulated the price of TerraUSD (UST), the Terra eco’s stablecoin, to prevent the asset from de-pegging from the dollar in 2021. This trading firm was later identified to be Jump Trading.
Three months later, a filing from the SEC identified the nature of the business agreement between Terraform Labs and Jump Trading. According to the filing, Jump Trading allegedly procured up to 62 million UST to support the stablecoin, keeping it from de-pegging from the dollar in 2021.
Read more:
What happened to Terra Luna: one year after collapse