According to the Gate.io News bot, Fox reporter Eleanor Terrett reported that Bryan Steil, the chairman of the U.S. House Digital Asset Subcommittee, revealed that the “STABLE Act” is being aligned with the Senate’s “GENIUS Act” after being reviewed on Wednesday. Both bills will undergo multiple rounds of draft revisions in the House and Senate, with technical support from the SEC and CFTC.
Steil pointed out that there is currently about a 20% difference between the two bills, which mainly lies in the wording of the texts rather than the substantive content. The main points of divergence include specific requirements for international stablecoin issuers, the division of regulatory responsibilities among states for issuing institutions, and certain technical details.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The differences between the stablecoin bills in the U.S. House and Senate are only 20%, mainly concerning the regulation of international issuers.
According to the Gate.io News bot, Fox reporter Eleanor Terrett reported that Bryan Steil, the chairman of the U.S. House Digital Asset Subcommittee, revealed that the “STABLE Act” is being aligned with the Senate’s “GENIUS Act” after being reviewed on Wednesday. Both bills will undergo multiple rounds of draft revisions in the House and Senate, with technical support from the SEC and CFTC.
Steil pointed out that there is currently about a 20% difference between the two bills, which mainly lies in the wording of the texts rather than the substantive content. The main points of divergence include specific requirements for international stablecoin issuers, the division of regulatory responsibilities among states for issuing institutions, and certain technical details.