Bitcoin ETF holders face over 15% unrealized losses: Will the decline in BTC price trigger a new wave of redemptions?

GateNews
BTC-3,55%

February 2 News, Bitcoin (BTC) prices continue to decline, with the latest quote around $76,800, significantly below previous highs. As a result, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF investors are facing an average unrealized loss of about 15%, and market sentiment is increasingly cautious. Research institutions Bianco Research and 10x Research estimate that since the ETF was listed in the U.S., investors’ average holding cost has been approximately $90,200, meaning the unrealized loss per BTC has exceeded $13,000.

Against the backdrop of price pressure, some short-term funds and speculators are re-evaluating their holding risks. Analysts point out that if Bitcoin cannot stabilize in the short term, redemption pressure on ETFs could further intensify, creating new downward momentum in the spot market. Especially during periods of weakening sentiment, shifts in capital flow often amplify price volatility.

From capital movement data, ETF demand has cooled significantly. Data shows that January marked the third consecutive month of net capital outflows, and this is the first time such products have experienced a “three consecutive declines” since their launch. During this period, multiple Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of up to $6.18 billion, reflecting that some investors are reducing their risk exposure.

Market participants warn that if the bear market continues, it could trigger larger-scale sell-offs. Historical experience shows that when long-term holders start to loosen and focus on liquidation, it is often accompanied by a surge in trading volume and the formation of a cyclical bottom. However, there are also differing opinions that institutional funds flowing into ETFs tend to be more long-term oriented, with a certain level of “stability,” making disorderly sell-offs less likely.

Currently, Bitcoin price trends remain in a critical observation period. If macroeconomic conditions and crypto market sentiment continue to be weak, the decision of ETF holders to stay or exit could become an important variable influencing the medium-term trend of BTC.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Bitcoin Mining Costs Surge Past $70K – Is DOGEBALL the Next 100x Crypto to Buy While Toncoin Targets $3?

The search for the next 100x crypto to buy often intensifies when market dynamics shift. Recent industry data shows that Bitcoin mining costs have surged past $70,000, while major Wall Street firms are increasingly funding mining companies exploring AI infrastructure as an alternative revenue

CaptainAltcoin4m ago

West Main Self Storage Boosts Bitcoin Treasury To 3.345 BTC

Bitcoin continues to reshape how companies manage corporate reserves. A growing number of businesses now view digital assets as strategic treasury tools. West Main Self Storage recently strengthened that trend with another Bitcoin purchase. The company added 0.145 BTC to

Coinfomania12m ago

Crypto Social Trends: Bitcoin and Ethereum Drive Conversation Across Layer-1 Ecosystem

According to a new crypto social activity report by Phoenix Group, the performance of large Layer-1 blockchain networks in online conversations and engagement is rising. The ranking, released on March 6, 2026, prioritizes the most active blockchain ecosystems in terms of social interactions and

BlockChainReporter40m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments