A special on-chain transfer has sparked heated discussion in the crypto community. An unidentified Bitcoin user sent approximately 2.56 BTC to the Bitcoin Genesis Address, which was worth nearly $180,000 at the time. This address is directly linked to the first block mined in 2009 and is widely regarded as a symbolic “starting wallet” left by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Blockchain explorers show that this fund only experienced a one-way inflow, with no records of any outflow. Since the private key associated with the Genesis Address has never been used, it is generally believed to be lost or permanently invalid. Therefore, any Bitcoin sent to it can no longer circulate, effectively “locked” on the chain. After this transfer, the total balance of the address exceeded 57 BTC, valued at several million dollars.
On social media, there was a brief speculation of “Satoshi Nakamoto’s return,” but blockchain analysts quickly clarified: the address has not made any outgoing transactions, and there is no proof of a direct connection to the Bitcoin creator. Several research institutions still estimate that Satoshi mined about 1.1 million BTC in the early days, but these assets have never been moved.
Such events are not unprecedented. Some users refer to these actions as “sacrificing to Satoshi,” often as a symbolic tribute or a deliberate act of asset destruction. Since these Bitcoins will not re-enter the market, they are theoretically expected to slightly reduce circulating supply, but the actual impact on prices is minimal.
In 2024, there have also been instances of transferring high-value BTC to the same address, each time sparking discussions about faith, remembrance, and waste. Industry experts generally believe that real market shocks will only occur when wallets associated with Satoshi Nakamoto make outgoing transactions. Until then, these kinds of transactions are more about adding new footnotes to Bitcoin’s legendary history.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Bitcoin ETFs 'will be larger' than gold ETFs: Analyst
Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) could surpass gold ETFs in total assets under management (AUM) as investor demand expands beyond the traditional “digital gold” narrative, according to ETF analyst James Seyffart.
“There are just more use cases of why somebody would put a Bitcoin ETF in a p
Cointelegraph20m ago
Bitcoin's $1.3 trillion security race: Key initiatives aimed at quantum-proofing the world's largest blockchain
Quantum computers capable of breaking the Bitcoin blockchain do not exist today. Developers, however, are already considering a wave of upgrades to build defenses against the potential threat, and rightfully so, as the threat is no longer hypothetical.
This week, Google published research
CoinDesk51m ago
Michael Saylor calls BIP-110 Bitcoin’s largest self-inflicted risk
Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor believes that Bitcoin (BTC) has gained overwhelming dominance in the global “media war.” However, he also warns that changes at the protocol level—especially the proposed BIP-110—could become the biggest remaining risk to the network
TapChiBitcoin56m ago
Here's what 'cracking' bitcoin in 9 minutes by quantum computers actually means
Google's Quantum AI team said earlier this week that a future quantum computer could derive a bitcoin private key from a public key in roughly nine minutes. The number ricocheted across social media and spooked markets.
But, what does it actually mean in practice?
Let's start with how bitcoin
CoinDesk1h ago
Data: Within two months after a major shock, Bitcoin’s performance has broadly outperformed gold and the S&P 500 index
Gate News message, April 5, according to data, within the two months after major global shock events, Bitcoin generally performed better than gold and the S&P 500 index (a U.S. stock market benchmark index). In specific data, after the Trump administration announced large-scale tariff measures in April 2025, Bitcoin rose 24% in the following 60 days, gold rose 8%, and the S&P 500 rose 4%. In early March 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, Bitcoin also rose 21%, outperforming gold and the S&P 500 index.
GateNews4h ago
