CLARITY Act New Developments: Crypto Groups Challenge Bank Proposals, Stablecoin Regulation May Reach a Compromise

On February 14, news reports indicate that as the debate over the implementation of the CLARITY Act continues, the cryptocurrency community has proposed new principles to oppose the bill draft put forward by banks. The Digital Commerce Association of the Blockchain Industry Association released a set of guiding principles, emphasizing that a two-year study on the impact of stablecoins on bank deposits is acceptable, but opposing provisions that automatically generate regulatory rules.

Cody Carbone, CEO of the Digital Commerce Association, stated that the industry is willing to compromise on stablecoins with static yields similar to bank savings accounts but emphasized that crypto companies should still be able to offer rewards to customers for transactions and other activities. He called on banks to return to the negotiating table to avoid missing the opportunity to establish a fair reward mechanism.

Previously, a meeting between the White House, banks, and crypto companies did not reach a clear agreement. Banks insisted that any yields or rewards on stablecoins could undermine the deposit functions of the U.S. banking system. The new proposal from the Digital Commerce Association aims to find a balance and promote a compromise between the crypto community and banks.

Patrick Vit, Executive Director of the President’s Digital Asset Advisory Committee, pointed out that the window for passing the CLARITY Act is rapidly closing, and political focus will shift to the midterm elections. He emphasized that all parties need to remain flexible, and the advisory committee has held multiple meetings at the White House to facilitate a compromise between the crypto community and banks regarding the bill.

Analysts believe that this proposal could offer new ideas for stablecoin regulation and also highlight the complex position of digital assets within the financial system. As the midterm elections approach, the final direction of the CLARITY Act remains uncertain, but the crypto industry’s ongoing efforts to promote fair reward mechanisms may influence the bill’s details and regulatory framework.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

U.S. "CLARITY Act" Advancement Stalled: Stablecoin Yield Dispute Becomes the Key, Legislative Window Remaining Only a Few Months

The CLARITY Act is progressing slowly in the U.S. Senate, mainly due to disagreements over stablecoin yield mechanisms. Senators are seeking a compromise, but the banking industry remains cautious, hoping to pass legislation before the 2026 elections. Time is tight, and whether the bill will pass remains uncertain.

GateNews3m ago

ASIC Australia's fintech director: Cryptocurrency is just finance with a new infrastructure system

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) argues that blockchain and cryptocurrency should not be treated as distinct assets, but rather regulated based on their actual economic functions, emphasizing traditional financial activities.

TapChiBitcoin9m ago

Russia cracks down hard on illegal Bitcoin mining: power theft farms raided, grid losses continue to grow

Russia has recently intensified its crackdown on illegal cryptocurrency mining, uncovering a case of electricity theft using the power grid, involving approximately $9,000 worth of electricity. Nevertheless, the Russian government has not completely banned the mining industry and plans to support compliant mining through regulations to curb the impact of underground mining on the power system.

GateNews12m ago

Bitcoin ATMs are listed as major tools for scams, with annual losses exceeding hundreds of millions in the US and Australia.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury reports that Bitcoin ATMs are becoming tools for scams. In 2024, the FBI received over 10,900 complaints, with losses totaling approximately $246.7 million. Scammers exploit the anonymity and irreversibility of cryptocurrency ATMs, especially targeting the elderly. Australia is also facing similar challenges, with the industry calling for increased regulation and implementing transaction limits, but experts believe that limits alone are insufficient to curb scams.

MarketWhisper14m ago

Thailand's crypto platform freezes over 10,000 accounts; slowdown mechanism combats money laundering and illicit activities

Thai digital asset providers have launched a "slowdown" mechanism, freezing over 10,000 suspicious crypto accounts to combat money laundering activities. This mechanism implements a 24-hour lock on transfers exceeding 50,000 Thai Baht and requires additional identity verification. While regulatory safeguards have been strengthened, the transaction experience for compliant users has been affected. Providers are also advancing cooperation with law enforcement agencies and implementing the travel rule, facing challenges due to inconsistent global enforcement.

MarketWhisper28m ago

South Korea's crypto regulatory signals strengthen: selling Bitcoin, restricting stablecoin investments, and setting limits on exchange equity

South Korea has recently introduced three digital asset policies, involving Bitcoin disposal, stablecoin investment, and restrictions on exchange equity holdings. The rapid liquidation of Bitcoin by judicial authorities has attracted attention, while restrictions on stablecoin investments and proposals to limit shareholder ownership ratios have sparked controversy. The market interprets these as regulatory tightening, and the future policy direction remains to be seen.

GateNews28m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments