#银行接入加密服务 Seeing that the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has confirmed that banks can engage in encryption asset trading, many people may feel that this is a Favourable Information signal. I want to remind everyone to see the essence of this matter clearly - banks are merely acting as a middleman, conducting transactions in a way that involves no-risk principal, in other words, they are just facilitating the buyers and sellers, without holding any encryption assets themselves.

The implementation of this policy indeed signifies that encryption assets have entered a more regulated financial system, but regulation itself does not mean that risks disappear. Bank participation ≠ encryption assets themselves becoming safe. On the contrary, this requires us to remain vigilant:

First, clarify your own risk tolerance. If you do not have a full understanding of the volatility of encryption assets, no matter how the bank participates, you should not rashly invest. Position management is always the top priority.

Secondly, do not be misled by the two words "compliance". Compliance is a baseline requirement, not a guarantee of profit. No matter how legitimate the channel, the risk attributes of the encryption assets themselves have not changed.

Third, maintain a long-term mindset. Truly valuable investment decisions are not based on short-term favourable information, but rather on a deep understanding of one's own financial situation and risk tolerance.

Financial innovation is progressing, but safeguarding your principal and mindset is always more important than chasing trends.