#代币空投 Seeing the recent operations of WET, what flashed through my mind was the chaos of ICOs in 2017. The token sales back then were incredibly chaotic, with the project party's technical abilities varying widely, hackers, opportunists, and bots taking turns to participate, making it impossible for ordinary users to participate fairly. This time, the 70% of HumidiFi's presale was stolen by a single entity through over 1,000 wallets, which is essentially a new version of these types of problems – the method has changed, but the essence remains the same.

But the interesting thing this time is that they chose a transparent and responsible way to handle it. They publicly acknowledged the problem, restarted, added anti-Bots mechanisms, and finally over 4,000 real users completed purchases. Although the fundraising amount of 2.07 million USDC is not large, it represents the quality of the participants. From the 80% of traders who are bullish, the market has recognized this attitude. A 100% increase does not occur out of thin air; it is backed by a confidence vote on "how to fix after failure."

This reminds me of an old observation: what truly distinguishes leading projects from second-tier projects is not whether they have encountered problems, but how they handle those problems once they arise. After the bear market of 2018-2019 and countless project parties running away, investors' emphasis on transparency and execution has changed completely. WET's ability to reverse in the short term is backed by the evolution of the entire market's perception — under the endorsement of core infrastructures like the Solana ecosystem and Jupiter, a project party that is willing to take responsibility for its users has become a rare commodity. This logic will continue to be validated in the next cycle.