👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
PoolTogether Case Dismissed, For Now
In late 2020, PoolTogether was sued by Joseph Kent, a software engineer who, at the time, was working as the tech lead for Senator Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign.
The lawsuit was filed taking advantage of a New York law that allows buyers of an illegal lottery ticket to file a class-action lawsuit against the issuer of the ticket. According to Kent, PoolTogether’s MO turned into an unlicensed casino and therefore took advantage of its users. However, the judge disagreed with this view of the DeFi project.
Inspired By Bonds, Not Casinos
PoolTogether is a DeFi project built on Optimism, a popular Layer-2 rollup network. The project was inspired by premium financial products available in the U.K. known as premium bonds, or colloquially as “no-loss lotteries.”
When a user chooses to deposit into PoolTogether’s fund, he earns a small chance to receive a daily prize. While this may indeed sound like plain old gambling with extra steps, users who did not win the prize get back all of their funds automatically.
According to PoolTogether’s FAQ, the prize money comes from interest earned on user deposits, which are sent by PoolTogether to larger staking pools in order to collect interest on behalf of PoolTogether users.
Judge Sides With DeFi
Fortunately for fans of the project, Judge Frederic Block agreed with the defense. It was largely funded by a series of Pooly NFTs, which were minted to help fund the case. So far, nearly $2 million have been contributed to PoolTogether’s legal fund in this manner.
Lawyers argued that Kent suffered no losses by depositing his funds in PoolTogether’s fund and accused the software engineer of depositing money for no other reason than to give him the ability to sue.
Judge Block allegedly agreed with this view. Nevertheless, he concurred that PoolTogether’s MO might not be completely in order. However, according to the judge, its legality would be a matter for a state court since, at a federal level, there was no evidence of wrongdoing.
It’s now up to Kent to decide if he will pursue his case locally or let the matter rest.