Duolingo 宣布將人工智慧功能「解釋我的答案」免費開放給所有學習者，旨在幫助學習者理解文法錯誤的原因，而不僅僅是提供正確答案。此功能可以動態生成針對性回饋，協助用戶深入理解語言結構，尤其在學習法語和韓語等複雜文法時，減少挫折感，並提升學習效果。未來，該功能將擴展支援更多語言。

摩根大通资产管理公司在公共区块链上推出了其首只完全代币化的货币市场基金——My OnChain Net Yield Fund (MONY)——标志着华尔街在传统投资产品中采用分布式账本技术的一个重要里程碑。

全球顶级金融机构摩根大通旗下资产管理公司正式推出其首支代币化货币市场基金——My OnChain Net Yield Fund（MONY）。该基金运行于以太坊区块链，面向合格投资者开放，初始种子资金为 1 亿美元。此举标志着拥有近 4 万亿美元管理规模的资管巨头，正将其传统金融领域的王牌产品系统性地引入区块链世界，旨在利用代币化技术提升交易效率、拓展应用场景，并满足客户对链上收益资产的日益增长的需求。

查理·芒格对比特币和马斯克都有过评价，今天看来，可能有些对，有些错，有些他对错误的反思也未必正确（比如他投资阿里失败，认为失败的原因是这是一个该死的零售商）；有些是还需要进一步考证的。 整理如下： 芒格对比特币的评价： 芒格表示：“比特币愚蠢、邪恶、让人觉得自己很傻。” + "In my life, I try to avoid things that are stupid, and evil, and make me look bad in comparison to someone else, and bitcoin does all

深潮 TechFlow 消息，12 月 10 日，RaveDAO 今日正式发布空投领取指南，明确 Genesis 创世会员及 2024–2025 年期间参与 RaveDAO 活动的社区成员的空投发放规则与时间窗口。此次空投旨在回馈在 RaveDAO 尚未发行代币前，就已通过链上互动、活动实体签到与社区建设为生态带来真实贡献的用户。所有空投将于 12 月 12 日代币发布（TGE）后陆续发放。 RaveDAO Genesis 创世会员为空投第一批发放对象。用户需前往 PLVR（RaveDAO 官方票务平台）→ My Membership → RaveDAO → My

From the night of December 8th to the early morning of the 9th, three strong earthquakes occurred consecutively within 24 hours in the eastern sea area of Honshu, Japan. The main quake was of magnitude 7.5 with a focal depth of 50 kilometers, followed by aftershocks of magnitude 5.6 and 6.6. Chinese tourists in Aomori Prefecture described: "The whole building was shaking. I scrambled and crawled to the bathroom to hide. This is the biggest earthquake I've ever experienced in my life."

原文标题：I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto 原文作者：Ken Chan 原文来源： 转载：火星财经 编者按：本周末，Aevo 联合创始人、首席技术官 Ken Chan（@kenchangh）的一篇文章在外网刷了屏，文章标题为「我在加密行业浪费了 8 年人生」（I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto）。 Ken Chan 在文章中的态度极为消极，他认为行业已丧失理想主义，转而变成一个人类历史上规模最大、参与人数最多的超级赌场，且对自己曾为这个赌场贡献过力量而感到恶心。虽然我们并不认同 Ken Chan 的观点

我的第一比特币，一个在萨尔瓦多知名的教育组织，因政府在比特币政策上的转变而停止运营，并结束了与教育部的合作。该组织成立于2021年，已为超过27,000名学生提供了免费课程。该组织计划在全球扩展，提供支持和培训项目。

赞助内容意大利球队国际米兰及土耳其国家足球队队长哈坎·恰尔汉奥卢也已进入币圈。这位著名足球运动员与妻子西宁·恰尔汉奥卢共同成立了名为My Lovely Planet (MLP)的Web3移动游戏公司，并获得了公司的股份。双方的合作内容是“恰尔汉奥卢

引言：当远见与技术交汇 2025 年的秋季，全球 Web3 产业将迎来一场前所未有的数字盛会 —— 首届「台湾区块链线上峰会 Taiwan Blockchain Online Space (TBOS)」。这不仅仅是一场会议，更是亚洲区块链生态的一次全面升级与拓展。由去中心化交易所 QuBitDEX 总冠名，TBOS 宣布将与亚洲两大区块链盛会 ——「台北区块链周 Taipei Blockchain Week (TBW)」和「马来西亚区块链周 MY Blockchain Week

一种名为“try my game”的 Discord 骗局正在蔓延，导致用户损失加密货币和 NFT。黑客通过社交工程手段获取信任，发送带恶意软件的链接，从而窃取个人信息并清空钱包。安全专家指出，这种利用信任的攻击手段越来越普遍。

社区建设游戏 My Neighbor Alice (MNA) 的新篇章正在开启。事实上，这是第一章，对于多年来一直在探索其群岛世界的玩家来说，这可能会让他们感到惊讶。不同的是，MNA 在其完全公开发布后现已正式退出 alpha 测试。

在2025年6月2日的命令中，商品期货交易委员会表示，My Big Coin的指定运营商必须向委员会支付2580万美元的罚款。 由CFTC发布的9084-25号命令密歇根州的Mark Gillilespie和加利福尼亚州的John Roche共同支付并

My Big Coin 背后的策划者被要求支付近 2600 万美元的罚款和赔偿金，因为美国法院裁定他们通过一个虚假的加密货币计划欺诈投资者。 根据监管机构的官方公告，美国

深潮 TechFlow 消息，6 月 13 日，据美国商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）报道，马萨诸塞州联邦法院对 My Big Coin 加密货币欺诈案作出最终判决，要求涉案方共同支付 1932.6 万美元罚金和 644.2 万美元受害者赔偿金。 被告包括来自密歇根州的 Mark Gillespie、加利福尼亚州的 John Roche 以及内华达州的两家公司 My Big Coin Pay Inc. 和 My Big Coin Inc.。法院认定他们在 2014 年至 2017 年期间虚假宣传 My Big Coin

马萨诸塞州联邦法院对My Big Coin因加密货币欺诈处以2600万美元的罚款，要求该公司及其高管支付1932万美元的罚款和644万美元给投资者，同时禁止进一步参与市场。

联邦法院裁决对参与欺诈性 My Big Coin 加密货币计划的个人和公司处以2500万美元的罚款，该计划虚假声称以黄金为支撑，欺骗了2014年至2017年间的投资者。资产追回仍然不确定。

Jelly-My-Jelly (JELLYJELLY) 在加密货币市场引发了兴趣，因为它的细分市场中鲸鱼活动恢复。今天，一只鲸鱼从 Gate.io 提取了 1 亿 464 万 JELLYJELLY 代币，价值 445 万美元。此交易显示了该资产的潜力。 昨天，一只鲸鱼

《科创板日报》4月18日讯（编辑 朱凌）英特尔新任华人首席执行官陈立武正在大刀阔斧地改革这家老牌芯片巨头。 过去数年，英特尔在制造制程、产品路线上的一系列失误，导致市场份额不断被台积电、AMD和英伟达蚕食。 近日，陈立武启动了自他上月就任以来最重要的一项改革——以扁平化公司领导团队为核心的组织架构调整。 “我要与工程、产品团队一起撸起袖子加油干（roll up my sleeves），真正了解我们该如何加强产品力与解决方案。”陈立武在一份内部备忘录中表示，英特尔的数据中心和人工智能芯片事业部以及客户端计算（PC芯片）事业部将直接向他汇报。 与此同时，原本主管这些工作的资深高管米歇尔·霍

伦敦，大伦敦，2025年4月11日，Chainwire 随着加密货币交易资金市场的快速增长，My Crypto Funding (MCF) 已确立为该领域领先的加密货币专营公司。该公司最近获得了由The Trusted颁发的2024年最佳加密交易条件奖。

Fox News’ My View播出了一集以比特币为重点的节目，节目中有老特、Michael Saylor和顶尖政府官员。 老特重申了将美国定位为比特币创新和经济增长领导者的计划。 公众反应各异；一些人将比特币视为金融自由，而其他人

FOX新闻的《我的观点》节目突出讨论了比特币对经济的影响，重要人物如迈克尔·塞勒和老特表示对数字资产的支撑。该晒旨在教育观众关于比特币的潜力及其在未来经济格局中的重要性。

拥有 340K 订阅者的热门加密 YouTuber My Financial Friend 评论了 Best Wallet 及其 $BEST 代币预售，该预售已筹集了近 1100 万美元。进入加密货币领域最重要的方面之一是了解如何安全地存储数字资产。 有各种各样的

佛罗里达男子被命令偿还760万美元给他欺骗使用虚假加密货币的投资者。他将资金用于奢侈品，而不是承诺的资产。

Jelly-My-Jelly的价格下跌了65％，目前以0.07150美元的价格交易，在交易量增加了5％的情况下。它从长期下跌中的复苏是逐渐的，涨幅仅为2.97％。

The Sandbox（SAND）：通过去中心化游戏赋予创造力，在繁荣的元宇宙经济中购买土地、创建NFT并获得奖励。 My Neighbor Alice (ALICE)：充满乐趣的农场与可交易资产、质押和治理相结合，融合了游戏玩家和加密货币爱好者的世界。 Decentraland

* * * * * If the SEC were a sports team measured by its “win” rate, it would be a runaway champ. But that win-loss record suffered a mild hit — and its first ever loss in an “ICO” case — one that refers to the controversial method of crowd fundraising and that borrows from the public company “IPO” or initial public offering. A federal judge denied the SEC a preliminary injunction against Blockvest after he granted a temporary restraining order on the same issue. We chat with Amit Singh, attorney and shareholder in Stradling’s corporate and securities practice group about the SEC’s fresh loss. His take? They’ll be out for blood, next. **For those not in the know, share the legal background leading up to this case.** In October of this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Blockvest LLC and its founder, Reginald Buddy Ringgold III. According to the complaint, Blockvest falsely claimed its planned December initial coin offering was “registered” and “approved” by the SEC and created a fake regulatory agency, the Blockchain Exchange Commission, which included a phony logo that was nearly identical to that of the SEC. The SEC also alleged Blockvest conducted pre-sales of its digital token, BLV, ahead of the ICO and raised more than $2.5 million. The SEC’s complaint alleged violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange and the Securities Act and violations of the Securities Act’s prohibitions against the offer and sale of unregistered securities in the absence of an exemption from the registration requirements. U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel issued a temporary restraining order “freezing assets, prohibiting the destruction of documents, granting expedited discovery, requiring accounting and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted” on October 5, 2018. On Tuesday, November 27, in the SEC’s first loss in stopping an ICO, judge Gonzalo Curiel stated that the SEC had not shown at this stage of the case that the BLV tokens were securities under the Howey Test, a decades-old test established by the U.S. Supreme Court for determining whether certain transactions are investment contracts and thus securities. If the tokens weren’t securities, all the SEC’s other allegations automatically fail Under the Howey Test, a transaction is an investment contract (or security) if: – It is an investment of money; – There is an expectation of profits from the investment; – The investment of money is in a common enterprise; and – Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party Later cases have expanded the term “money” in the Howey Test to include investment assets other than money. The judge said that the SEC failed to show investors had an expectation of profits. “While defendants claim that they had an expectation in Blockvest’s future business, no evidence is provided to support the test investors’ expectation of profits,” the judge wrote. Blockvest argued that the pre-ICO money came from 32 “test investors” and said the BLV tokens were only designed for testing its platform. It presented statements from several investors who said they either did not buy BLV tokens or rely on any representations that the SEC has alleged are false. The SEC responded by noting that various individuals wrote “Blockvest” or “coins” on their checks and were provided with a Blockvest ICO white paper describing the project and the terms of the ICO. Judge Curiel said that evidence, by itself, wasn’t enough: “Merely writing ‘Blockvest or coins’ on their checks is not sufficient to demonstrate what promotional materials or economic inducements these purchasers were presented with prior to their investments. Accordingly, plaintiff has not demonstrated that ‘securities’ were sold to [these] individuals.” **Won’t the case proceed? Why is the denial of an injunction important here?** This does not mean that the SEC cannot pursue an action against the defendants Rather it just means that the SEC didn’t meet the high burden required to receive a preliminary injunction of proving “(1) a prima facie case of previous violations of federal securities laws, and (2) a reasonable likelihood that the wrong will be repeated.” The court determined that, at this stage, without full discovery and disputed issues of material facts, the Court could not decide whether the BLV token were securities. Since the SEC didn’t meet its burden of proving the tokens were securities in the first place, it couldn’t have shown that there was a previous violation of the federal securities laws So, the first prong was not met Further, the defendants agreed to stop the ICO and provide 30 days’ prior notice to the SEC if they intend to move forward with the ICO So, the court determined that there was not a reasonable likelihood that the wrong will be repeated As a result, the SEC’s motion for a preliminary injunction was denied. Nonetheless, this is an important case as it is the first time the SEC went after an ICO issuer and the issuer pushed back and won (if only temporarily) It reminds us that, though most people think of the SEC as judge and jury in securities actions, that isn’t the case Ultimately, an issuer that pushes back may have a chance if it has the wherewithal to fight and if it has good arguments However, this does not mean that the SEC is done with them and we may very well see this case continue. **Won’t media coverage of this case ultimately impair Blockvest’s ability to raise funds — its ultimate goal?** That may very well be the case. Unfortunately, unsophisticated investors could ultimately merely remember the Blockvest name and decide that it must be a good investment since they’ve heard of it (ala PT Barnum – “I don’t care what the newspapers say about me as long as they spell my name right.”). But I may be too cynical (hopefully I am). In any case, I would be surprised if Blockvest attempts to pursue an ICO without either registering the tokens or utilizing an exemption from the registration requirements. They clearly have a target on their back, so the SEC would love another crack at them I’m sure. Plus, even though a preliminary injunction was denied here, the SEC still got what it wanted as Blockvest agreed not to pursue the ICO without giving the SEC 30 days’ prior notice of its intent to do so. So, the investing public was ultimately protected. **What is the SEC’s current stance on what constitutes a security based on this case?** The SEC will still point to the Howey Test Further, as stated in recent speeches by Hinman and others, the SEC seems to be focused not only on the utility of any tokens (i.e., they can be used on the platform for which they were created), but also on decentralization (that the efforts of the promoters are no longer required to maintain the value/utility of the tokens/platform). However, the court in this case looked at the investment of money prong differently than has historically been the case Normally, the investment of money prong is assumed with little analysis as any consideration is considered “money” for purposes of the test But this case looked at the investment not from the purchaser’s subjective intent when committing funds, but instead based the analysis on what was offered to prospective purchasers and what information they relied on So, issuers are well advised to be very careful in how they advertise an offering. Further, the expectation of profits prong wasn’t met because, according to Blockvest, these were just test investors So, it wasn’t clear these folks invested for a profit The tokens were never even used or sold outside the platform. **Where does the Ninth Circuit sit in regards to what is a security?** The Ninth Circuit follows the Howey Test. However, the common enterprise element has received extensive and varied analysis in the federal circuit courts For example, while all circuits accept “horizontal” commonality as satisfying the common enterprise prong of the Howey Test, a minority of circuits (including the ninth) also accept “vertical” commonality in this analysis. Horizontal commonality involves the pooling of assets, profits and risks in a unitary enterprise, while vertical commonality requires that profits of investors be “interwoven with and dependent upon the efforts and success of those seeking the investment or of third parties” (narrow verticality), or “that the well-being of all investors be dependent upon the promoter’s expertise” (broad commonality). SEC v. SG Ltd., 265 F.3d 42, 49 (1st Cir. 2001). The Ninth Circuit is the only one to accept the narrow vertical approach (though it also accepts horizontal commonality), which finds a common enterprise if there is a correlation between the fortunes of an investor and a promoter.” Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Eurobond Exchange, Ltd., 13 F.3d 1334, 1339 (9th Cir., 1994). Under this approach a common enterprise is a venture “in which the ‘fortunes of the investor are interwoven with and dependent upon the efforts and success of those seeking the investment….'” Investors’ funds need not be pooled; rather the fortunes of the investors must be linked with those of the promoters, which suffices to establish vertical commonality. So, a common enterprise exists if a direct correlation has been established between success or failure of the promoter’s efforts and success or failure of the investment. **Which Federal Circuits might offer an equal or even bigger split with the SEC?** I wouldn’t really say that any courts split with the SEC as the SEC’s decisions take precedent over any decisions of those courts. However, there is a split among the circuits as described above with respect to what type of commonality is sufficient to find a common enterprise. **What impact could the outcome of this case have on ICOs at large?** This case may embolden companies who have already conducted ICOs to push back on any SEC actions that they might not otherwise fight as it shows that the SEC will always have to meet the burden of proving all factors of the Howey Test are met before the SEC has jurisdiction over the offering in the first place. **Has the Supreme Court addressed anything crypto, crypto related, or analogous?** The only case I know of where the Supreme court has addressed crypto currencies is Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States. That was a case about whether stock counts as “money remuneration” The dissent in that case talked about how our concept of money has changed over time and said that perhaps “one day employees will be paid in bitcoin or some other type of cryptocurrency.” This goes against the IRS’s position that cryptocurrencies are property and should be taxed as such But, it was just a passing comment in the dissent. So, it has no precedential value. But, it may embolden someone to fight the IRS’s position.

来源：刘教链 隔夜BTC继续围绕96k中枢震荡，等待与30日线汇合。有不少人说山寨季启动了。教链只是看到，自己的Uniswap仓位收益率正在紧追以太坊仓位，就还差10个点了。 教链对待持仓，基本上是遵循“eat my own dog food（吃自己的狗粮）”原则的：自己用Uniswap，所以持有Uniswap；自己在EVM上开发代码，所以持有以太坊；自己囤BTC作为储蓄工具，所以持有BTC。 所以教链对于纯粹的“炒”是没有什么兴趣的。炒币，炒股，炒房子，还不如炒鸡蛋，炒黄瓜，炒土豆丝，炒油麦菜，炒蒿子杆，……

基于区块链的游戏AXS币、Decentraland、Illuvium和My Neighbor Alice提供独特的游戏元素、所有权模式和治理结构，吸引了玩家和投资者。通过玩赚机制、NFT和免费gas交易，这些游戏代表了游戏平台的未来。

据Dogecoin及My Doge钱包UX/UI设计师DogeDesigner透露，马斯克在一段语音讯息中表示自己持有大量的Dogecoin，而SpaceX也持有大量的比特币。此前特斯拉曾将持有的比特币转移至未知地址，引发社群热议。部分社群认为此次消息是DOGE社群拉回市场关注度的举动，但目前DOGE价格未出现明显波动。

苹果推出iOS 18.2 「Find My」测试版，用户可与特定第三方和航空公司分享AirTag和物件所在的网路位置，帮助用户找回遗失物。此功能建立于 Find My 网路里，并进行端对端匿名和加密，不过不排除有心人利用AirTag做非法使用。共享位置可随时停用或预设分享功能将于七天后过期。

KTX.Finance 宣布推出“个人投资组合（My Portfolio）”功能，旨在为用户和交易者提供平台资产状况、盈利能力和交易历史数据，赋予用户对交易过程的解读能力。 “个人投资组合”功能提供以下功能： 展示当前资产状况、资产分布和盈利能力。 历史交易数据和盈利能力的细节呈现，附带对不同时间段的具体图表分析。 访问多种的历史记录，包括交易、质押和奖励。 共享功能，使用户可以便捷展示他们的平台收入。 “个人投资组合”包含六个页面，分别为：

作者：Logic；来源：LXDAO ‍MyFirstLayer2 由以太坊基金会赞助支持，是 LXDAO “ My First ” 系列的教育项目。我们希望通过文字 + 图片 + 动画 + 交互，以最简单易懂的方式向 Web3 用户普及 Layer 2 知识并开始安全的使用 Layer 2。 在上一篇文章中，我们探讨了 Layer2 技术的由来和基本原理，为区块链解决了“不可能三角”所带来的一系列挑战。然而，每一项技术的成熟都离不开不断的探索和试错。今天，我们将深入 Layer2 的历史长河，看看在这条探索之路上，二层网络都经历了哪些重要的里程碑。 让我们以 Alice 的例子开始。假设...

作者：萨摩 在SeeDAO投研公会的第七十九次周会中，我们迎来了不少新人小伙伴的加入，同时还有幸邀请到了著名的萨摩老师作为嘉宾。萨摩老师涉猎广泛，是一个跨领域的学习者和科普爱好者，也是BuidlerDAO、LXDAO等多个DAO的杰出贡献者，非常熟悉区块链的技术知识。作为嘉宾，萨摩老师在这次周会上给我们分享了“My First Layer 2”为主题的科普讲解，本文就让我们一起来回顾萨摩老师的精彩观点吧。 — 公链发展的瓶颈 ▎传统公链如BTC、ETH的平均TPS（每秒可处理交易笔数）太低，难以满足web3当前以及未来经济活动的需求； ▎为了满足用户的使用需求，21年初开始兴起了...

2023年10月7日，推特用户NFTshepard和Horlomite Research发文爆料称知名NFT项目胖企鹅（Pudgy Penguins）现任CEO Luca Netz之前收购Pudgy Penguins的资金来自多个跑路NFT项目，调查了Luca Netz收购胖企鹅之前参与的多个跑路骗局（参阅金色财经此前报道“调查：胖企鹅CEO不为人知的秘密”）。 胖企鹅CEO Luca Netz随后发推回顾创业历程，Luca Netz还转发Mase的“They hate to see us win”和马斯克的“If there’s a big scandal about me, my onl...