Eric Trump’s astonishing prophecy! Gold capital will massively shift to Bitcoin

Eric Trump recently publicly claimed that funds are flowing massively from gold into Bitcoin, calling it “the greatest asset of all time.” This statement is not unfounded; behind it is President Donald Trump’s Executive Order No. 14233 signed on March 6, 2025, which officially established the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, including approximately 198,000 Bitcoin seized through criminal forfeiture, valued at $8.8 million per Bitcoin, totaling $17.4 billion.

The Trump Family’s Bitcoin Strategic Deployment

Executive Order No. 14233 signed by President Donald Trump marks the U.S. government’s first inclusion of Bitcoin into the national strategic asset reserve. This batch of about 198,000 Bitcoin mainly comes from years of criminal forfeitures by law enforcement agencies, including major cases such as Silk Road dark web marketplace and the Bitfinex hacker incident. Valued at $88,000 per Bitcoin, the total worth is approximately $17.4 billion, comparable to the foreign exchange reserves of a medium-sized country.

The symbolic significance of this policy far exceeds its actual value. $17.4 billion is negligible compared to the U.S. national debt of $38 trillion, leading critics to question its real impact. However, supporters emphasize that the importance lies in the policy signal: for the first time, the U.S. government regards Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset on par with gold. This official recognition is poised to fundamentally change global investors’ perception of Bitcoin.

As a spokesperson for the Trump family in the cryptocurrency space, Eric Trump’s statements are not merely personal opinions but are highly coordinated strategic messaging aligned with government policy. When he claims “funds are flowing from gold to Bitcoin,” he is essentially endorsing the government’s Bitcoin reserve policy, aiming to influence market expectations and accelerate this capital shift.

Drivers of Capital Shift from Gold to Bitcoin

1. Structural Disadvantages in the Digital Age

Physical gold incurs high transportation costs, requiring complex logistics and security measures for cross-border transfers. In today’s era of globalization and real-time settlement demands, gold’s physical nature becomes a critical weakness. Bitcoin can complete global transfers within minutes without any intermediaries.

2. Friction Costs in Verification and Storage

Authenticating gold’s genuineness requires specialized equipment and techniques, and storage demands expensive vaults and security systems. Bitcoin’s verification can be performed by anyone running a node, and storage only requires a private key, with almost zero cost. This efficiency difference is highly attractive to institutional investors.

3. Transparency and Predictability of Supply

Gold’s annual mining volume is affected by geological conditions and mining technology, making precise forecasts difficult. Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins is embedded in code, with issuance plans fully transparent and unchangeable. Against the backdrop of quantitative easing and rising currency devaluation risks, this scarcity guarantee becomes a core competitive advantage.

These drivers are not merely Eric Trump’s personal discourse but are narratives reinforced by the cryptocurrency community over the past years. The involvement of the Trump family elevates this narrative from the fringe to mainstream, compelling traditional financial institutions and conservative investors to reassess Bitcoin’s asset status.

The Generation Gap Between Digital Gold and Physical Gold

For centuries, gold has held a special position in the global financial system, with central banks holding it as reserves and investors turning to gold for safe-haven during crises. However, in the modern financial system, gold’s dominance faces unprecedented challenges. Younger investors, raised in a native digital financial environment, are more inclined to allocate funds to digital assets rather than physical commodities.

Institutional participation accelerates this shift. The launch of regulated Bitcoin investment products allows large capital inflows without direct Bitcoin holdings. Approval of Bitcoin ETFs lowers previous barriers to mainstream adoption, enabling pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and other conservative institutions to allocate to Bitcoin through compliant channels.

Macroeconomic conditions also stimulate interest in alternative investments. Concerns over inflation, rising debt levels, and currency volatility drive investors toward assets perceived as outside government control. Eric Trump describing Bitcoin as “the greatest asset” captures this shift in risk aversion, moving capital from physical gold to digital gold.

From a media perspective, Eric Trump’s remarks initially appeared via Bitcoin Junkies, then were cited and widely disseminated by Cointelegraph. This dissemination path indicates that the cryptocurrency narrative is moving from niche communities into mainstream media, with the Trump family’s endorsement greatly accelerating this process.

Market Realities and Risk Warnings

Despite growing enthusiasm for Bitcoin, whether it can replace or even rival gold remains uncertain. Volatility remains a key issue. Gold prices tend to move slowly, while Bitcoin has experienced single-day swings over 20%, which could test investor confidence. Critics argue that a true safe-haven asset should not exhibit such high price volatility.

Regulatory uncertainties also cannot be ignored. Although the U.S. government has established a Bitcoin strategic reserve, regulatory standards and classifications for digital assets are still being developed worldwide. Policy decisions could influence adoption rates and capital flows. If future administrations reverse the crypto-friendly policies of the Trump government, it could trigger market volatility.

Some analysts warn against viewing this as a zero-sum game. Gold and Bitcoin may coexist as alternative stores of value within diversified portfolios. Gold’s long history and stability attract conservative investors, while Bitcoin’s innovation and growth potential appeal to those willing to take higher risks. Capital flows may gradually shift rather than change overnight.

If capital continues to flow from gold into Bitcoin, the impact could be significant. The gold market is worth trillions of dollars; even a small reallocation of funds could greatly influence Bitcoin’s liquidity and market structure. However, such a transition typically takes years rather than months. Eric Trump’s remarks are merely another data point in this ongoing debate, not a definitive prediction.