Gate News news: In the United States, the enforcement division of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is stepping up its oversight of insider trading in prediction markets. In April 2026, CFTC Chief Enforcement Officer David Miller publicly said at New York University that the agency has noticed signs of relevant violations and will take enforcement action against conduct that uses material nonpublic information for trading, explicitly denying the market perception that “there is no insider trading in prediction markets.”
Miller said some market participants mistakenly think event contracts are a form of “gambling,” causing them to overlook compliance risks. In reality, these types of products are classified under the legal framework as swap contracts and are subject to strict financial regulatory rules. This means that both information leaks and trades based on nonpublic information may trigger legal liability.
A series of recent cases has intensified regulatory attention. For example, trades that involved making precise bets ahead of major policy statements from Trump, as well as high-yield trades related to the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, are viewed as potential abnormal behavior. In addition, trading around events related to the Iran situation and its leaders has also sparked discussions at the national security level.
Data shows that the prediction market has been expanding rapidly, with monthly trading volume already exceeding $20 billion. As the market grows, regulators are beginning to focus on areas such as insider trading, market manipulation, and anti-money-laundering compliance. Miller emphasized that the CFTC will prioritize serious violations rather than minor or borderline issues.
Meanwhile, the U.S. legislative branch is also moving forward to strengthen regulatory measures in parallel. The recently proposed “2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act” and the PREDICT Act are both intended to limit the ability of government officials to participate in prediction trades using an information advantage. Some platforms have also launched self-regulatory mechanisms, rolling out new trading rules to reduce compliance risk.
As the regulatory framework is gradually tightened, prediction markets are shifting from “gray areas” toward standardized development. For investors, participating in such markets in the future will not only require judging event probabilities, but also paying closer attention to the compliance of legal boundaries and the sources of information.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Encouraging innovation! A U.S. judge bars Arizona from regulating a prediction market and suspends the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled that Arizona is prohibited from relying on its gambling laws to prosecute prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in financial market regulation, while Kalshi insists that its business falls under financial products rather than traditional gambling. Rulings on prediction markets vary from state to state, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity1h ago
Encouraging innovation! A U.S. judge bans Arizona’s regulators from prediction markets and suspends the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court has ruled that Arizona is barred from using its gambling law to sue the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the Federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in financial market regulation, and Kalshi maintains that its business falls under financial products rather than traditional gambling. Courts in different states have issued differing rulings on prediction markets, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity4h ago
Polymarket Trader Turns $500 Into $252K After UFC Makes Yet Another Scoring Error
In brief
A Polymarket trader walked away with $252,000 in profit after the UFC incorrectly identified a fight’s winner for the second time in two weeks.
An X account linked to the Polymarket trader said that they had noticed the error by looking at the bout’s official scorecard.
The
Decrypt5h ago
Polymarket reviews and weeds out early-stage projects in its ecosystem, targeting insider trading and market manipulation behaviors
Polymarket announced an audit of some of the onboarded startup projects that have been accused of using allegedly insider trading account information to steer users into making trades. The move is intended to strengthen compliance management and address external concerns about the risks of insider trading.
GateNews5h ago
Encourage innovation! A U.S. judge bans Arizona-regulated prediction markets and suspends prosecution against Kalshi.
A U.S. federal district court has ruled that Arizona is barred from using the gambling law to prosecute the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the line between state and federal authority over financial market regulation, while Kalshi maintains that its business is a financial product rather than traditional gambling. Decisions on prediction markets vary from state to state, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity7h ago
Encourage innovation! A U.S. judge bars Arizona’s regulation of prediction markets, and pauses the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled to block Arizona from suing the prediction market platform Kalshi under its gambling laws, finding that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in regulating financial markets. Kalshi has insisted that its business is a financial product rather than traditional gambling. Rulings by different states on prediction markets have varied, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity11h ago
