I don't know if many friends are currently using artificial intelligence for drawing pictures. I have been using it recently, but there are two points that interest me more: Is the copyright on the drawn image considered my own? If others use it, can they gain any benefits?
After some research, I think I found some answers on @GaiAIio: this project is an AI tool + DAO based on assets, specializing in the creative field. The main goal is to allow graphics and even creator prompts to be considered their own, and they can also be exchanged for money.
I looked at the logic, and it was quite simple, along with three points that concern creators the most:
First — copyright is very clear: it creates a "file on the chain" ( called a creative assets graph ) for each work, and each step is recorded on the chain — from inputting words, choosing a model, to generating the work, who uploads and reuses it. In the future, if someone uses your photo or prompt, the source is clear, and there's no need to discuss "who copied whom."
Second — the tool is easy to use: the built-in AI creation assistant is very friendly to beginners. You don't need to handle complex model deployment yourself; you can upload your own model, save useful prompts, and perform a series of processes — from sketching the first draft to changing details, without switching between programs.
Third — creativity can generate money: a new film can be rewarded; others upload your photos, use your prompts, and you can share the earnings; if your model or prompt is particularly popular, you can also open a subscription to receive licensing fees, which is equivalent to adding passive income to your creation.
The project results can also be verified: 100,000 people used the testnet in just 48 hours, and now over 1 million works are stored on the chain, with more than 20,000 creative exchanges happening daily.
Their tokens have already $GAIX been listed on platforms like Binance Alpha and BingX, and the price has actually been steadily increasing all the time with a slight correction in the middle, and now it is also stable at around 0.2+!
The contract address is: 0xc12efb9e4a1a753e7f6523482c569793c2271dbb. If you want to learn more details, visit the official website (.
In fact, the rarest thing about GaiAI is that it doesn't play with concepts but reflects the real needs of creators: copyright should be stable, tools should be smooth, and earning money (is the most important). The AI-generated drawing evolves from a "simple tool" to an "ecology that can rely on it."
I don't know if there are many friends who use AI to draw pictures now, I have been using it recently, but there are two points that I am more curious about, is the copyright of the drawn picture counted as my own? If others use it, can they get some benefits?
After looking around, I seem to have found some answers on the @GaiAIio, this project is an AI tool + on-chain asset DAO specializing in the creative field, the core is to allow the creator's graphs and even prompts to be counted as their own, and can also be exchanged for money
I looked at the logic, and it was quite simple, and it was also the three points that the creator was most concerned about:
The first is that copyright is very clear: it creates an "on-chain file" (called a creative asset graph) for each work, and every step is recorded on the chain from the prompt words you input, the model you choose, to the generation of the work, who downloads and reuses it. In the future, someone will use your picture or prompt word, the source is clear, and there is no need to talk about "who copied whom".
The second is that the tool is easy to use: the built-in AI creation assistant is very friendly to novices, you don't have to engage in complex model deployment by yourself, you can pass your own model, save useful prompts, and complete a set of processes from drawing the first draft to changing details, without having to switch software back and forth.
the third is that creation can make money: a new picture can be rewarded; Others download your pictures, use your prompts, and you can share the money; If your model or prompt is particularly popular, you can also open a subscription to receive a license fee, which is equivalent to adding passive income to your creation
The results of the project are also verifiable: the testnet was used by 100,000 people in just 48 hours, and now there are more than 1 million works piled up on the chain, and more than 20,000 creative exchanges are made every day
And their tokens have $GAIX already been on platforms such as Binance Alpha and BingX, and the price has basically risen steadily all the way, with a slight correction in the middle, and now it is also stable at 0.2+!
The contract address is this: 0xc12efb9e4a1a753e7f6523482c569793c2271dbb, if you want to know more details, go to the official website (
In fact, the most rare thing about GaiAI is that it does not play with concepts, but captures the real needs of creators: copyright must be stable, tools must be smooth, and money can be made (this is the most important thing), and AI drawing has been made from a "simple tool" to an "ecology that can rely on it to eat".
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
I don't know if many friends are currently using artificial intelligence for drawing pictures. I have been using it recently, but there are two points that interest me more: Is the copyright on the drawn image considered my own? If others use it, can they gain any benefits?
After some research, I think I found some answers on @GaiAIio: this project is an AI tool + DAO based on assets, specializing in the creative field. The main goal is to allow graphics and even creator prompts to be considered their own, and they can also be exchanged for money.
I looked at the logic, and it was quite simple, along with three points that concern creators the most:
First — copyright is very clear: it creates a "file on the chain" ( called a creative assets graph ) for each work, and each step is recorded on the chain — from inputting words, choosing a model, to generating the work, who uploads and reuses it. In the future, if someone uses your photo or prompt, the source is clear, and there's no need to discuss "who copied whom."
Second — the tool is easy to use: the built-in AI creation assistant is very friendly to beginners. You don't need to handle complex model deployment yourself; you can upload your own model, save useful prompts, and perform a series of processes — from sketching the first draft to changing details, without switching between programs.
Third — creativity can generate money: a new film can be rewarded; others upload your photos, use your prompts, and you can share the earnings; if your model or prompt is particularly popular, you can also open a subscription to receive licensing fees, which is equivalent to adding passive income to your creation.
The project results can also be verified: 100,000 people used the testnet in just 48 hours, and now over 1 million works are stored on the chain, with more than 20,000 creative exchanges happening daily.
Their tokens have already $GAIX been listed on platforms like Binance Alpha and BingX, and the price has actually been steadily increasing all the time with a slight correction in the middle, and now it is also stable at around 0.2+!
The contract address is: 0xc12efb9e4a1a753e7f6523482c569793c2271dbb. If you want to learn more details, visit the official website (.
In fact, the rarest thing about GaiAI is that it doesn't play with concepts but reflects the real needs of creators: copyright should be stable, tools should be smooth, and earning money (is the most important). The AI-generated drawing evolves from a "simple tool" to an "ecology that can rely on it."
After looking around, I seem to have found some answers on the @GaiAIio, this project is an AI tool + on-chain asset DAO specializing in the creative field, the core is to allow the creator's graphs and even prompts to be counted as their own, and can also be exchanged for money
I looked at the logic, and it was quite simple, and it was also the three points that the creator was most concerned about:
The first is that copyright is very clear: it creates an "on-chain file" (called a creative asset graph) for each work, and every step is recorded on the chain from the prompt words you input, the model you choose, to the generation of the work, who downloads and reuses it. In the future, someone will use your picture or prompt word, the source is clear, and there is no need to talk about "who copied whom".
The second is that the tool is easy to use: the built-in AI creation assistant is very friendly to novices, you don't have to engage in complex model deployment by yourself, you can pass your own model, save useful prompts, and complete a set of processes from drawing the first draft to changing details, without having to switch software back and forth.
the third is that creation can make money: a new picture can be rewarded; Others download your pictures, use your prompts, and you can share the money; If your model or prompt is particularly popular, you can also open a subscription to receive a license fee, which is equivalent to adding passive income to your creation
The results of the project are also verifiable: the testnet was used by 100,000 people in just 48 hours, and now there are more than 1 million works piled up on the chain, and more than 20,000 creative exchanges are made every day
And their tokens have $GAIX already been on platforms such as Binance Alpha and BingX, and the price has basically risen steadily all the way, with a slight correction in the middle, and now it is also stable at 0.2+!
The contract address is this: 0xc12efb9e4a1a753e7f6523482c569793c2271dbb, if you want to know more details, go to the official website (
In fact, the most rare thing about GaiAI is that it does not play with concepts, but captures the real needs of creators: copyright must be stable, tools must be smooth, and money can be made (this is the most important thing), and AI drawing has been made from a "simple tool" to an "ecology that can rely on it to eat".