Many retirees cling to outdated investment frameworks that fail to account for income-generating strategies. The widely cited “rule of 25”—suggesting you need 25 times your annual retirement spending saved—overlooks a critical variable: dividend yield. But when you factor in how closed-end funds translate market gains into regular cash payouts, the math shifts dramatically.
The Traditional Formula Falls Short
The “rule of 25” stems from William Bengen’s 4% safe-withdrawal rate, established in 1994. Under this framework, a retiree needing $40,000 annually would require $1 million saved. For a 20% saver earning $100,000 yearly to accumulate that million at typical 8.5% stock market returns takes nearly 30 years.
Bengen himself revised this in 2022, adjusting to a 4.7% withdrawal rate, which roughly translates to a “21.27-times rule.” Still, this assumes you’re selling shares to fund retirement—a strategy that backfires during market downturns.
CEFs Offer a Superior Income Alternative
Closed-end funds fundamentally change this equation. Instead of liquidating positions, investors receive regular distributions that reflect the fund’s earnings. Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (USA) exemplifies this approach, currently yielding 10.6%—more than double the traditional 4% guideline.
The dividend math works like this: A retiree needing $40,000 annually would require only $943,397 under USA’s current yield, slashing the accumulation timeline to roughly 17.5 years for our hypothetical saver. That’s nearly 12 years faster than the conventional method.
Why Dividend Sustainability Matters
Skeptics question whether these 10%+ yields remain reliable. USA’s 39-year track record provides the answer. The fund has distributed approximately 82.4 cents per share annually on average—an 11.6% yield on 1987’s share price of $7.13. More importantly, investors could deploy those dividends two ways:
Option 1: Reinvestment Growth — Shareholders who reinvested distributions saw cumulative returns exceed 1,840% over decades, weathering the dot-com crash, 2008 financial crisis, and recent market volatility.
Option 2: Income Replacement — Those needing cash could live entirely on dividend payouts without touching principal, maintaining financial freedom through multiple economic cycles.
Building a 2026 Income Portfolio
USA represents just one model. A diversified income strategy combining four high-yield CEFs targets a collective 9.2% yield, holding blue-chip equities, bonds, and real estate investment trusts (REITs). This approach solves the retiree’s core problem: generating sufficient passive income to cover expenses without forced asset sales during market stress.
The dividend equation ultimately reveals this truth: when yield sufficiently covers your spending needs, the magic number drops from 25 to something far more attainable. For 2026 retirees, that transformation isn’t theoretical—it’s a pathway to financial independence years earlier than traditional rules suggest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Rethinking Your Retirement Blueprint: How High-Yield CEFs Change the Dividend Math in 2026
Many retirees cling to outdated investment frameworks that fail to account for income-generating strategies. The widely cited “rule of 25”—suggesting you need 25 times your annual retirement spending saved—overlooks a critical variable: dividend yield. But when you factor in how closed-end funds translate market gains into regular cash payouts, the math shifts dramatically.
The Traditional Formula Falls Short
The “rule of 25” stems from William Bengen’s 4% safe-withdrawal rate, established in 1994. Under this framework, a retiree needing $40,000 annually would require $1 million saved. For a 20% saver earning $100,000 yearly to accumulate that million at typical 8.5% stock market returns takes nearly 30 years.
Bengen himself revised this in 2022, adjusting to a 4.7% withdrawal rate, which roughly translates to a “21.27-times rule.” Still, this assumes you’re selling shares to fund retirement—a strategy that backfires during market downturns.
CEFs Offer a Superior Income Alternative
Closed-end funds fundamentally change this equation. Instead of liquidating positions, investors receive regular distributions that reflect the fund’s earnings. Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (USA) exemplifies this approach, currently yielding 10.6%—more than double the traditional 4% guideline.
The dividend math works like this: A retiree needing $40,000 annually would require only $943,397 under USA’s current yield, slashing the accumulation timeline to roughly 17.5 years for our hypothetical saver. That’s nearly 12 years faster than the conventional method.
Why Dividend Sustainability Matters
Skeptics question whether these 10%+ yields remain reliable. USA’s 39-year track record provides the answer. The fund has distributed approximately 82.4 cents per share annually on average—an 11.6% yield on 1987’s share price of $7.13. More importantly, investors could deploy those dividends two ways:
Option 1: Reinvestment Growth — Shareholders who reinvested distributions saw cumulative returns exceed 1,840% over decades, weathering the dot-com crash, 2008 financial crisis, and recent market volatility.
Option 2: Income Replacement — Those needing cash could live entirely on dividend payouts without touching principal, maintaining financial freedom through multiple economic cycles.
Building a 2026 Income Portfolio
USA represents just one model. A diversified income strategy combining four high-yield CEFs targets a collective 9.2% yield, holding blue-chip equities, bonds, and real estate investment trusts (REITs). This approach solves the retiree’s core problem: generating sufficient passive income to cover expenses without forced asset sales during market stress.
The dividend equation ultimately reveals this truth: when yield sufficiently covers your spending needs, the magic number drops from 25 to something far more attainable. For 2026 retirees, that transformation isn’t theoretical—it’s a pathway to financial independence years earlier than traditional rules suggest.