LI

LI Auto Price

LI
$18,35
-$0,07(-%0,38)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-07 21:24 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-07 21:24, LI Auto (LI) is priced at $18,35, with a total market cap of $18,45B, a P/E ratio of 109,04, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $18,15 and $18,50. The current price is %1,10 above the day's low and %0,81 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 303,92K. Over the past 52 weeks, LI has traded between $15,71 to $32,02, and the current price is -%42,69 away from the 52-week high.

LI Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$18,46
Market Cap$18,45B
Volume303,92K
P/E Ratio109,04
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Diluted EPS (TTM)0,55
Net Income (FY)$1,09B
Revenue (FY)$109,25B
Earnings Date2026-06-04
EPS Estimate0,26
Revenue Estimate$3,19B
Shares Outstanding999,88M
Beta (1Y)0.585

About LI

Li Auto Inc. operates in the energy vehicle market in the People's Republic of China. It designs, develops, manufactures, and sells premium smart electric vehicles. The company's product line comprises MPVs and sport utility vehicles. It offers sales and after sales management, and technology development and corporate management services, as well as purchases manufacturing equipment. The company offers its products through online and offline channels. The company was formerly known as Leading Ideal Inc. and changed its name to Li Auto Inc. in July 2020. Li Auto Inc. was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.
SectorConsumer Cyclical
IndustryAuto - Manufacturers
CEOXiang Li
HeadquartersBeijing,None,CN
Official Websitehttps://www.lixiang.com
Employees (FY)19,39K
Average Revenue (1Y)$5,63M
Net Income per Employee$56,39K

Learn More about LI Auto (LI)

Gate Learn Articles

LI.FI has secured $29 million in Series A funding to further expand its cross-chain liquidity infrastructure.

Berlin-based cross-chain infrastructure protocol LI.FI has successfully closed a new Series A funding round, raising $29 million and pushing its total funding to over $51.7 million. Specializing in cross-chain liquidity aggregation, LI.FI continues to integrate decentralized exchanges and cross-chain bridges to create a unified liquidity layer supporting multi-chain asset swaps. The company aims to deliver seamless cross-chain infrastructure for Web3 developers.

2025-12-12

<p>Republished from "Cobo Stablecoin Weekly No.19: After the Stablecoin Act Passes, Where Is the Next “Battleground”?"</p> <h3 id="h3-5biC5Zy65qaC6KeI5LiO5aKe6ZW/5Lqu54K5">Market Overview & Growth Highlights</h3><p>The total stablecoin market capitalization reached $269.696 billion, up $2.606 billion from the previous week. USDT remains the clear market leader with a 61.25% share. USDC comes in second with a $64.502 billion market cap, representing 23.92% market share.</p> <h2 id="h2-5Yy65Z2X6ZO+572R57uc5YiG5biD56iz5a6a5biB5biC5YC85YmN5LiJ572R57uc77ya">Top 3 Blockchain Networks by Stablecoin Market Cap:</h2><ol> <li>Ethereum: $135.786 billion</li><li>Tron: $82.995 billion</li><li>Solana: $11.431 billion</li></ol> <h3 id="h3-5ZGo5aKe6ZW/5pyA5b+r55qE572R57ucIFRPUDPvvJo=">Top 3 Fastest-Growing Networks This Week:</h3><ol> <li>Berachain: +96.57% (USDT: 43.15% share)</li><li>XRPL: +49.84% (RLUSD: 49.11% share)</li><li>Sei: +47.95% (USDC: 85.96% share)</li></ol> <p>Source: DefiLlama</p> <h2 id="h2-8J+Or+e+juWbveOAiumTtuihjOS/neWvhuazleOAi+WSjOeos+WumuW4geaUr+S7mOeahOmakOengeimgeaxgg==">U.S. Bank Secrecy Act and Stablecoin Payment Privacy Requirements</h2><p>After the U.S. Stablecoin Act passed, privacy is now the next key concern for both regulators and the market.</p> <p>With stablecoin market cap breaking $270 billion and moving rapidly into mainstream payments, the “total transparency” of on-chain transactions is exposing new issues. On a public blockchain, every transaction is permanently accessible, which means that for enterprises, complete financial histories, supply chain details, and payroll structures become visible to competitors. While a nuisance for retail users, this is a hard stop for institutions and businesses. Real-time visibility enables competitors to track every payment. Without a solution, stablecoin adoption in commercial payments and institutional settlements will be seriously limited.</p> <p>Should privacy remain a hurdle, stablecoin institutional and commercial adoption will stall. Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal recently noted that for the GENIUS Act and similar laws to be effective, simultaneous upgrades to the Bank Secrecy Act are essential. The current system is inefficient and creates centralized data honeypots of sensitive data, which are hacker targets and offer minimal benefits for anti-money laundering.</p> <p>Grewal emphasized privacy and security should not be mutually exclusive. Emerging technologies like zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) and decentralized identity (DID) now provide “compliance verification without disclosing raw user data,” so institutions can view only the results of compliance checks—not the full data sets. This balances data minimization and effective regulation. He called for the U.S. Treasury Department to lead public-private collaboration, accelerate compliance processes that are ZKP-ready, focus monitoring on suspicious transaction triggers, and apply AI-driven risk control models to improve screening. The result: privacy protection without undermining regulatory rigor, removing obstacles to large-scale institutional adoption of stablecoins, and helping the US maintain global digital asset leadership.</p> <h2 id="h2-8J+Or+e+juWbveWIqeaBr+emgeS7pOS4i++8jOeos+WumuW4geeahOOAjOWlluWKsee7j+a1juWtpuOAjQ==">U.S. Interest Ban Spurs New Stablecoin “Reward Economics”</h2><p>Regulatory restrictions often spark unexpected innovation. The GENIUS Act prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest, intended to curb risky behaviors, but instead accelerated explosive growth in yield-oriented stablecoins. Since the Act, products like Ethena’s USDe have added billions in supply, using exchange funding rates (not Treasuries) for yields—sidestepping legal restrictions entirely.</p> <p>In this regulatory gap, Coinbase and PayPal have reframed stablecoin returns as “rewards,” circumventing issuer-only rules. Coinbase, acting as a USDC distributor, passes on Circle’s earnings to users. PayPal uses Paxos to isolate issuer risk and still delivers 4.5% annualized returns. Anchorage and Ethena Labs have even linked stablecoin yields to tokenized assets like BlackRock’s BUIDL, enabling compliant institutional yield channels.</p> <p>Paying returns to holders is a key strategy for attracting capital in both emerging and established markets. Coinbase has even API-integrated “interest rewards” via a wallet SDK, lowering integration barriers for developers. In high-inflation markets such as Latin America, Slash’s USDSL delivers a 4.5% annual reward, leveraging dollar-denominated assets to attract rapid inflows. Stablecoins are applying more complex, compliant financial engineering, efficiently channeling returns from underlying assets and rewriting user and value dynamics.</p> <h3 id="h3-8J+Or+mmmea4r+OAiueos+WumuW4geadoeS+i+OAi+eUn+aViOeahOWFs+mUruivjeKAlOKAlOmAj+aYjuS4juWFqOmTvui3r+ebkeeuoQ==">Transparency & End-to-End Oversight: The Core of Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Regulation</h3><p>With Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Ordinance now in force, market debates center on mandatory KYC, policies for offshore stablecoins, and DeFi compatibility. In reality, <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0ODgzMDE5MA==&amp;mid=2247510734&amp;idx=1&amp;sn=368a5a6ed3d067ba05eacbb4be234dd7&amp;scene=21#wechat_redirect">the regulation’s essence is targeted control—not broad prohibition—for stablecoins issued or HKD-denominated in Hong Kong, especially RMB-related tokenized assets</a>. Offshore stablecoins like USDT, USDC, etc. remain largely unrestricted in secondary markets. The city’s strategy is clear: hold tight control over issuance and apply rigorous compliance to high-value scenarios such as RMB tokenization and offshore RMB stablecoins, establishing “quasi-sovereign settlement instruments” and differentiating from the US- and EU-driven models.</p> <p>Transparency and full-chain oversight are the ordinance’s keywords. Strict standards span the entire stablecoin lifecycle—from issuance, custody, and clearing to distribution—with steep licensing requirements. Downstream custody, distribution, and clearing providers must also meet compliance. Banks, payment services, and blockchain infrastructure firms are unified in a single framework, with the market moving from “open access” to “permissioned access.” MPC wallet, compliance, and risk control technology providers will become the primary partners for banks and tech firms alike.</p> <p>This regulatory rigor brings new challenges. Issuers are now fully responsible for downstream compliance—including custody, distribution, clearing, and other third parties. Any new entrant must meet both technical and organizational requirements, pushing the sector toward professionalization and giving infrastructure providers massive new opportunities. For example, technology vendors providing multi-signature, MPC, HSM, and related mechanisms—especially MPC wallets—will help issuers make private key security a foundation of trust, balancing asset sovereignty and legal traceability. Wallets now serve as critical entry points for compliance and security architectures, rather than merely back-end tools.</p> <h2 id="h2-5biC5Zy66YeH55So">Market Adoption</h2><h3 id="h3-8J+MseaRqeagueWkp+mAmu+8mkRlRmkg5ZKM6LWE5Lqn6YCa6K+B5YyW5aKe6ZW/44CM5LuN5Luk5Lq65aSx5pyb44CN">JPMorgan: “DeFi & Tokenization Growth Still Disappointing”</h3><h3 id="h3-6KaB54K56YCf6KeI">Highlights</h3><ul> <li>DeFi total value locked (TVL) has not yet returned to 2021 highs; primary players are still retail and crypto-native firms, with minimal traditional institutional activity.</li><li>Tokenized global assets total only about $25 billion—analysts call this “insignificant.” Of 60+ tokenized bonds, combined value is just $8 billion; secondary market trading is nearly zero.</li><li>Institutions face three hurdles: lack of cross-border regulatory alignment, ambiguous legal status for on-chain investing, and insufficient smart contract/protocol safety guarantees.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The report shows a major gap between DeFi/tokenization hype and real-world use. Infrastructure is improving and KYC-compliant vaults and permissioned lending pools are emerging, but traditional finance remains cautious. The report notes the mainstream system is moving toward faster, cheaper settlements via fintech, which may diminish the need for blockchain rails—pushing crypto to deliver more convincing institutional-grade apps.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+MsSBSZW1pdGx5IOWQr+eUqOeos+WumuW4geaKgOacr+S8mOWMlui3qOWig+aUr+S7mOS4muWKoSDvvIzlsIbmjqjlh7rlpJrluIHnp43mlbDlrZfpkrHljIXmnI3liqE=">Remitly Deploys Stablecoin Tech to Optimize Cross-Border Payments; Multi-Currency Wallet Coming</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Remitly’s multi-currency “Remitly Wallet” launches September, supporting both fiat and stablecoin balances—targeted at users in high-inflation/volatile markets.</li><li>In partnership with Stripe’s Bridge, Remitly will offer stablecoin payout to users in over 170 countries, expanding beyond fiat rails.</li><li>Remitly now uses USDC and similar dollar stablecoins for internal treasury management, enabling 24/7 capital flows, reducing pre-funding, and increasing efficiency.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This is the first large-scale use of stablecoin technology by a mainstream cross-border payments provider. Integrating stablecoins, Remitly offers both inflation-hedging for customers in unstable markets and liquidity solutions for remittance systems. Stablecoin adoption in real payments will advance, better serving hundreds of millions who depend on cross-border financial services, particularly in regions lacking traditional financial infrastructure.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+MsSBUZXRoZXIgQ0VP77yaNDAlIOWMuuWdl+mTvuaJi+e7rei0uea6kOiHqiBVU0RUIOi9rOi0pg==">Tether CEO: 40% of Blockchain Gas Fees Are USDT Transfers</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino posted that 40% of all blockchain transaction fees (across 9 major chains) are for USDT transfers.</li><li>Hundreds of millions in emerging markets use USDT daily to hedge against local currency depreciation and inflation—making it one of the world’s most active blockchain apps.</li><li>In the context of crypto, “transactions” usually refer to trading, arbitrage, etc. on exchanges—not always requiring on-chain transfers. A USDT on-chain transfer (with fee) typically signals real movement between wallets—not mere speculation.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>USDT is now the dominant blockchain application, far ahead of other uses. Paolo predicts future competition in blockchain will center on gas fee optimization and USDT-related costs. Stablecoins have evolved from trading tools to real-world financial infrastructure, especially in volatile economies—demonstrating real progress in financial inclusion via crypto.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-5a6P6KeC6LaL5Yq/8J+UrueRnuepl+mTtuihjO+8mkNvaW5iYXNlIFEyIOi0ouaKpeaYvuekuiBDaXJjbGUgVVNEQyDliKnmtqbnjofmraPlnKjokI7nvKk=">Macro Trends Mizuho: Circle USDC Profits Squeezed per Coinbase Q2 Earnings</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Mizuho analysts estimate Circle earned $625 million in Q2 interest from USDC reserves; $332.5 million of this went to Coinbase.</li><li>With Binance and other new partners joining, Circle’s net reserve margin faces growing cost pressure.</li><li>After the GENIUS Act, JPMorgan and Bank of America both plan to launch stablecoins, stoking USD stablecoin competition.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Despite strong IPO performance, Mizuho keeps an “Underperform” rating and $85 target for Circle, warning markets underestimate USDC risk. As profit-sharing with Coinbase ends and distribution broadens, Circle’s profitability faces headwinds—especially as rates fall and banks pile in. This shift could reshape the stablecoin market.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+Urue+jui0ouaUv+mDqOWIm+e6quW9leaJqeWkp+efreacn+WbveWAuuWPkeihjO+8jOeos+WumuW4geaIkOaWsOS5sOWutg==">U.S. Treasury Bill Issuance Hits Record—Stablecoins a New Source of Demand</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>The U.S. Treasury will auction $100 billion in 4-week T-bills—a record, up $5 billion from last round. 8- and 17-week bill sizes remain unchanged.</li><li>Short-dated yields >4% are fueling inflows—$16.7 billion entered T-bill ETFs in Q2, double YoY.</li><li>The Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee flagged rising stablecoin issuance as a new source of T-bill demand. The GENIUS Act obliges issuers to hold Treasuries as safe collateral.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The Trump administration prefers short-term borrowing. Treasury Secretary Bessent says long-term issuance is too costly at current rates. Stablecoin demand is now a structural factor in T-bill markets, as regulation orders issuers to hold safe assets. Meanwhile, central banks are cutting USD reserves in favor of gold—BofA sees gold possibly breaking $4,000 as debt sustainability fears climb.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+UruOAikdFTklVUyDms5XmoYjjgIvpgJrov4fku6XmnaXmlLbnm4rlnovnqLPlrprluIHkvpvlupTmv4Dlop4=">Yield Stablecoin Supply Surges Post GENIUS Act</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Since July 18, supply of Ethena’s USDe yield stablecoin has grown 70% to $9.49 billion, now the #3 stablecoin by market cap.</li><li>Sky’s USDS grew 23% to $4.81 billion, ranking fourth. These coins yield through staking.</li><li>USDe yields 10.86% (annualized); USDS, 4.75%. After U.S. June inflation (2.7%), real yields are 8.16% and 2.05%.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The GENIUS Act’s yield payment ban spawned a boom in stakable stablecoins. Investors are migrating to protocol-native yield, bypassing regulatory limitations. The stablecoin market has grown from $205 billion to $268 billion this year and may reach $300 billion by year-end. Despite tighter regulation, demand for high-yield USD substitutes stays strong—driving new DeFi innovation and adoption.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-5paw5ZOB6YCf6YCS8J+RgOWJjeiLueaenOW3peeoi+W4iOaOqOWHuumakOengeS/neaKpOWKoOWvhiBWaXNhIOWNoSBQYXl5">Product Launches Ex-Apple Engineer Debuts Privacy-Focused Crypto Visa Card, Payy</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Payy Visa card uses ZKP and its proprietary blockchain to ensure user stablecoin transaction amounts remain private and are not publicly accessible on-chain.</li><li>Developed by ex-Apple iOS engineer Sid Gandhi at Polybase Labs over three years, ensuring both privacy and compliance.</li><li>Payy is user-focused, with frictionless onboarding and simple self-custody—even for blockchain novices.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Payy solves two major crypto payment hurdles—privacy and usability. Regular blockchain payments reveal transaction history, but Payy preserves privacy within compliance. This enables daily self-custody stablecoin spending and presents a viable alternative to traditional banking.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgE1ldGFNYXNrIOaIluS4jiBTdHJpcGUg6K6h5YiS6IGU5ZCI5o6o5Ye656iz5a6a5biBIG1tVVNE">MetaMask May Partner with Stripe to Launch mmUSD Stablecoin</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Leaked Aave governance proposal suggests MetaMask and Stripe plan to launch the mmUSD dollar stablecoin, backed by M^0.</li><li>The proposal calls mmUSD MetaMask’s “cornerstone asset,” to be deeply integrated with all wallet/trading/yield functions.</li><li>The proposal was deleted; Aave Chan Initiative’s Marc Zeller confirmed authenticity but said release was premature.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This is another tech giant (after PayPal, Robinhood) entering stablecoins. MetaMask teaming up with Stripe could speed up integration of stablecoins for both Web3 and traditional payments.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgENvaW5iYXNlIOaOqOWHuuW1jOWFpeW8j+mSseWMheW3peWFt+WMhe+8jOeugOWMluW8gOWPkeiAhSBXZWIzIOeUqOaIt+W8leWFpea1geeoiw==">Coinbase Launches Embedded Wallet SDK to Streamline Web3 User Onboarding</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Coinbase’s developer platform (CDP) adds Embedded Wallets SDK: lets developers add self-custody wallet features easily.</li><li>SDK includes crypto onramp, token swap, and USDC 4.1% yield. It aims to remove the tradeoff between UX and custody risk.</li><li>Unlike legacy wallets, users can sign in via email/SMS/OAuth—no browser plugin or seed phrase needed—facilitating fast and straightforward onboarding.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Coinbase is lowering the barriers for Web3 app adoption by making wallet integration simpler and more secure. The SDK runs on Coinbase’s DEX-grade infra and is part of its “super app” strategy—positioning Coinbase as the essential bridge from Web2 to crypto.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgCDnvo7lm73mlbDlrZfpk7booYwgU2xhc2gg5o6o5Ye6IFN0cmlwZSBCcmlkZ2Ug5Y+R6KGM55qE56iz5a6a5biB77yM5pSv5oyB6Z2e576O5LyB5Lia6L275p2+5pS25LuYIFVTRCDlkoznqLPlrprluIE=">U.S. Digital Bank Slash Launches Stripe-Bridge Stablecoin: USDSL Offers Simple USD & Stablecoin Payments for International Businesses</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>San Francisco digital bank Slash issues USDSL, a dollar stablecoin, via Stripe’s Bridge.</li><li>USDSL enables global dollar payments for businesses without a US bank account—cuts settlement time and FX fees.</li><li>The launch coincides with the GENIUS Act’s passage, which defines a US stablecoin regulatory regime.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>With regulatory clarity, fintechs are rapidly entering the stablecoin field. Slash’s Stripe-issued USDSL shows how traditional and crypto finance are converging to solve global payments—proving that with regulation, stablecoins are moving from concept to real-world business solutions.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgOeJueacl+aZruWFs+iBlOmhueebriBXb3JsZCBMaWJlcnR5IOaOqOWHuiBVU0QxIOeos+WumuW4geW/oOivmuW6puiuoeWIkg==">Trump-Aligned World Liberty Debuts USD1 Stablecoin Loyalty Program</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Backed by the Trump family, World Liberty Financial’s USD1 loyalty program launches with Gate and others, modeled after airline miles.</li><li>Earn points by trading USD1 pairs, holding, staking, using in DeFi, and engaging via the WLFI app.</li><li>USD1 stablecoin, launched in April, claims to be fully backed by short-term US Treasuries, USD deposits, and other cash equivalents—issued via BitGo Trust.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>With Trump and his sons as World Liberty ambassadors, potential conflicts-of-interest surface. Tying stablecoins and loyalty rewards together signals a new model for user retention amid fierce stablecoin competition—and reflects closer government-crypto sector ties.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgOaRqeagueWkp+mAmuaOqOWHuuWfuuS6jiBLaW5leHlzIOWMuuWdl+mTvueahOmTvuS4iuaXpeWGheWbnui0reino+WGs+aWueahiA==">JPMorgan Debuts On-Chain Intraday Repo on Kinexys Blockchain</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>JPMorgan, HQLA-X, and Ownera launch cross-ledger repo: dealers swap funds/securities using Kinexys blockchain deposit accounts.</li><li>The platform covers all stages—from trade to collateral to settlement—down to the minute.</li><li>Can already handle $1 billion daily; built for scale with plans for more venues, assets, and digital cash tools.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>JPMorgan is setting a new standard for institutional blockchain adoption. Kinexys (ex-Onyx) anchors its digital asset strategy and could eventually underpin deposit tokens, stablecoins, and CBDCs—reducing market fragmentation. With the debut of JPMD (a JPMorgan stablecoin) and expanded Coinbase partnerships, Wall Street is moving past pilots into production blockchain applications.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-55uR566h5ZCI6KeE8J+Pm++4j1BheG9zIOWboCBCaW5hbmNlIEJVU0Qg5ZCI5L2c5YWz57O76KKr57q957qm55uR566h5py65p6E572a5qy+IDQ4NTAg5LiH576O5YWD">Regulatory Compliance Paxos Fined $48.5M for Binance BUSD Partnership by NYDFS</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Paxos Trust will pay $26.5M in fines to NYDFS plus $22M for compliance upgrades.</li><li>Regulators found flaws: In 2018, during BUSD launch with Binance, Paxos failed due diligence on its partner and its anti-money laundering efforts.</li><li>Paxos accepted Binance’s claim of “fully restricting US users” without confirming independently; NYDFS halted BUSD issuance in 2023.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This penalty shows that stablecoin issuer partnerships—especially offshore—face tough regulatory scrutiny. Paxos says it fixed these issues years ago, but the case sends a warning: issuers must conduct robust due diligence and build strong compliance. As the GENIUS Act takes effect and the stablecoin sector scales, regulatory risk for issuer-exchange partnerships is set to rise.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+Pm++4j+eJueacl+aZruetvue9suihjOaUv+WRveS7pO+8jOWBnOatoumTtuihjOWvueWKoOWvhui0p+W4geS8geS4mueahOOAjOS4jeWFrOW5s+ihjOS4uuOAjQ==">Trump Executive Order Ends Banks’ Unfair Practices Against Crypto Companies</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>President Trump’s executive order bars federal agencies from penalizing banks that serve crypto firms based on “reputational risk.”</li><li>The order ends “Operation Choke Point 2.0,” blocking denials based on politics or “high-risk” labeling.</li><li>The Fed, OCC, and FDIC now vow not to consider “reputation” in customer vetting. Top lawmakers support the shift.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This directive removes a key lever from regulators, forcing banks to make decisions based on legal and financial—rather than reputational—risk. It establishes crypto’s legal status and ensures equal access to banking, paving the way for deeper traditional-crypto integration as regulatory reforms continue.</li></ul> <p>Capital Moves</p> <p>Tether Acquires EU MiCA-Licensed Exchange Bit2Me, Leads $32.7M Funding</p> <p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Tether has bought a minority stake in Spain’s Bit2Me and is leading a $32.7M (€30M) round set to close soon.</li><li>Bit2Me is the first Spanish-language exchange with an official MiCA license—authorized to operate across 27 EU states.</li><li>The investment funds Bit2Me’s expansion in Europe and Latin America (starting with Argentina). Founded 2014; serves 1.2 million users.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Tether’s deal is a strategic push to secure access to Europe as MiCA rules tighten. As several exchanges deprioritize USDT, Tether’s investment builds new compliant markets for its stablecoin—demonstrating the power of its $4.9B quarterly profit for global expansion.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+SsFJpcHBsZSDlsIbmlqXotYQgMiDkur/nvo7lhYPmlLbotK3nqLPlrprluIHmlK/ku5jlubPlj7AgUmFpbA==">Ripple to Buy Stablecoin Payment Platform Rail for $200M</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Ripple will acquire Rail for $200M, deal to close Q4 2025.</li><li>Rail is projected to power 10%+ of global stablecoin payments ($3.6B market) next year.</li><li>The deal lets Ripple deliver enterprise-grade stablecoin payments (RLUSD, XRP, others) with fiat on/offramps—no crypto custody needed for clients.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Ripple’s second major buy this year (after April’s $1.25B Hidden Road deal) marks its rapid stablecoin market expansion. With active MiCA licensing in the EU and RLUSD cleared in Dubai, Ripple is building a global stablecoin platform—shifting from cross-border specialist to full-service finance player as institutional competition intensifies.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-5aOw5piO77ya">Disclaimer:</h3><ol> <li>This article is sourced from [<a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9eK_y7Hteu4QC2Af4zlPMA">Cobo</a>], original title: "Cobo Stablecoin Weekly No.19: After the Stablecoin Act Passes, Where Is the Next “Battleground”?". Copyright belongs to the original author [<em>Cobo</em>]. If you have concerns about republication, please contact the <a href="[https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/3967](https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/3967">Gate Learn Team</a> for assistance.</li><li>Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely the author’s and do not constitute investment advice.</li><li>The Gate Learn Team translated other language versions. Reproduction, distribution, or translation is strictly prohibited unless Gate.com is properly cited.</li></ol>

2025-08-13

A Review of How I Profited from the Venus THE Attack

Venus Protocol, a leading lending protocol on BNB Chain, was hit by a classic Mango Markets-style price manipulation attack. The attacker targeted the low-liquidity asset THE, leveraging recursive borrowing, oracle manipulation, and a “donation attack” to bypass supply caps and artificially push the price above $0.60, extracting around $27 million in assets. In this article, Weilin Li offers an in-depth analysis of the attack mechanics and details how he identified the severe mismatch between the nominal value and liquidity of collateral, ultimately earning $15,000 through a precise short position on THE.

2026-03-17

LI Auto (LI) FAQ

What's the stock price of LI Auto (LI) today?

x
LI Auto (LI) is currently trading at $18,35, with a 24h change of -%0,38. The 52-week trading range is $15,71–$32,02.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for LI Auto (LI)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of LI Auto (LI)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of LI Auto (LI)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for LI Auto (LI)?

x

Should you buy or sell LI Auto (LI) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of LI Auto (LI)?

x

How to buy LI Auto (LI) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

LI Auto (LI) Latest News

2026-04-06 11:05

Liquid Capital founder Li Huahua made a strategic investment in imBack, saying it helped recover the BTC that was lost 18 years ago

Gate News message, April 6, Liquid Capital founder Yi Lihua (Jack Yi) announced on social media that the crypto asset recovery provider imBack helped him successfully unlock an iPhone that had been locked away 18 years ago and recover the BTC that he previously believed had been permanently lost. Yi Lihua said that he had already given up hope of recovering that wallet, and imBack’s technical capabilities exceeded expectations. Based on this experience, he has quickly completed a strategic investment in imBack. It is reported that imBack can provide asset recovery services for users who hold assets such as BTC, ETH, etc., but cannot access their wallets due to device lockouts or loss of private keys.

2026-04-02 11:41

The core executive Li Xiong of the Taizi Group was escorted back to his home country, and the related wallets of Huìwàng that he founded have received more than $24 billion in cryptocurrency

Gate News message, April 2, Li Xiong, a core member of the Taizi Group and formerly the chairman of Huione Group, has been escorted back to China. Li Xiong is suspected of committing multiple crimes, including running a gambling operation, fraud, illegal business operations, and concealing or disguising proceeds of crime. In 2018, Li Xiong established the payment company Huione Pay PLC (Huione Pay) in Cambodia. According to statistics from blockchain analytics firm Elliptic, since 2021, the cryptocurrency wallets used by Huione as guarantor and its merchants have received more than $24 billion, making Huione Guarantor the largest online illegal marketplace to ever operate at such a scale.

2026-04-02 07:23

Huione money laundering network core figure arrested; amount involved exceeds $89 billion. Crypto criminal enterprise hit hard again

Gate News update: Chinese police recently escorted Li Xiong, a key figure allegedly behind the Huione criminal network, from Phnom Penh, Cambodia back to China. He will face multiple charges, including fraud and money laundering. According to official information, Li Xiong previously served as chairman of the Huione Group and was an important member of the Chen Zhi criminal group. The organization has long provided funding-cleansing channels for cross-border investment scams such as “pig butchering.” The investigation indicates that the Huione network is linked to a global large-scale illegal online trading system, with a cumulative volume of processed crypto assets exceeding $89.0 billion. It spans multiple countries and regions. Previously, U.S. law enforcement agencies carried out an ongoing crackdown on the related network and seized more than 127,000 bitcoins, which has a direct link to the Chen Zhi-operated system. This operation took place only a few months after Chen Zhi was brought under control, showing that multiple parties, including China and the U.S., have strengthened coordination in combating cross-border crypto crime. Chinese public security authorities also disclosed that several members of the criminal group have been arrested in succession, and the case is being further investigated in depth. Although core members have been taken down one after another, the related illicit business network has not completely disappeared. Multiple independent reports show that the Huione system has resumed operations by changing domains, shifting communications channels, and other measures, and continues to remain active on platforms such as Telegram. This decentralized, cross-border operating model gives it a relatively strong ability to withstand crackdowns. Industry insiders say this case highlights the complex role crypto assets can play in money-laundering chains, and also reflects the ongoing challenges faced by global regulators in responding to new forms of financial crime. As enforcement continues to intensify, compliance reviews surrounding the movement of crypto funds are expected to tighten further, and market participants need to improve their risk identification and security prevention capabilities.

2026-04-02 03:30

Yinchuan court mediates a virtual currency entrusted investment dispute, with the defendant ordered to return the investment principal

Gate News, April 2, Yinchuan City Xingqing District People’s Court has recently concluded a civil and commercial dispute arising from entrusted investment in virtual currency. After the plaintiff, Wei M., met the defendants, Li M. and Hu M., online, the plaintiff transferred funds to Li M. and entrusted him to jointly carry out virtual currency investment operations with Hu M. The earlier investment generated some returns, and the plaintiff participated in the distribution of dividends. Later, because the plaintiff urgently needed funds, he requested repayment of the investment principal, but this was unsuccessful. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in court, claiming “unjust enrichment.” After reviewing the case, the presiding judge held that the underlying legal relationship in this case should be a relationship of a mandate/agency contract. The judge informed the plaintiff that filing suit on the basis of unjust enrichment carried a high risk of losing, and also pointed out to the defendant that the two parties indeed had an entrusted investment relationship. If the matter proceeded as a dispute over a mandate/agency contract, the defendant would very likely have to bear the responsibility to return the funds. Through mediation, the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit against Hu M.; Li M. returned the investment principal to the plaintiff; and both sides reached a settlement.

2026-03-28 05:30

Brother Ma Ji, Huang Li Cheng, opened a new 10x leverage HYPE long position this morning, and the overall position shifted from profit to loss.

Gate News message. On March 28, according to Hyperbot data, “Maji Big Brother” Huang Licheng opened 10x leverage HYPE long positions this morning, currently holding 9,000 HYPE. In addition, he also holds an ETH long position with 25x leverage (currently holding 3,975 ETH) and a BTC long position with 40x leverage (currently holding 33 BTC). At present, his total position value is about $10.442 million, and it has turned from profit to loss, with an unrealized loss of approximately $248,000.

Hot Posts About LI Auto (LI)

SadMoneyMeow

SadMoneyMeow

5 hours ago
On April 7, Huatai-Pinebridge Fund Management Co., Ltd. issued an announcement stating that recently, the secondary market trading price of the Huatai-Pinebridge CSI HanJiaoSuo CSI Korea Semiconductor Exchange-Traded Open-Ended Index Securities Investment Fund (QDII) (expanded securities abbreviation: Huatai-Pinebridge China-Korea Semiconductor ETF, trading code: 513310) under the company has been noticeably higher than the fund’s reference net asset value per unit, resulting in a significant premium. This is hereby to alert investors to pay attention to the risk of a premium in secondary market trading prices. If investors invest blindly, they may suffer major losses. To protect investors’ interests, this fund was suspended from the opening of trading on April 7, 2026 until 10:30 a.m. on the same day. If the premium level of the fund’s secondary market trading price at the midday close remains at a relatively high level, the fund has the right to apply to the Shanghai Stock Exchange for a temporary suspension of trading during the afternoon trading session on April 7, 2026 until the close, as a measure to warn the market of risks. It is understood that this fund type is an index fund—overseas stocks. The latest price is 3.0287 yuan. The fund was established on November 2, 2022. The fund manager is Huatai-Pinebridge Fund Management Co., Ltd., and the fund custodian is China Construction Bank Corporation. The fund’s current size is 3.67B yuan (as of December 31, 2025). Data as of December 31, 2025: the fund’s stock net exposure ratio is 99.12%, with no bond net exposure ratio; the cash net exposure ratio is 1.94%. The fund managers are Liu Jun and Li Muyang. Liu Jun has accumulated more than 16 years of service. He has served as this fund manager since November 2, 2022, with a term return of 195.34%. Currently, he manages 31 funds, with a total fund asset size of 550.92B yuan. Li Muyang has accumulated more than 5 years of service. She has served as this fund manager since November 2, 2022, with a term return of 195.34%. Currently, she manages 30 funds, with a total fund asset size of 28.87B yuan. (Editor: Liu Chang) 【Disclaimer】This article only represents the author’s own views and is not related to Hexun. The Hexun website maintains a neutral stance toward the statements and judgments made in the text, and does not provide any express or implied guarantees regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the content included. Readers are requested to use this information for reference only and assume full responsibility for their own actions. Email: news_center@staff.hexun.com Report
0
0
0
0
GateUser-bd883c58

GateUser-bd883c58

13 hours ago
Ask AI · How Should Energy Storage Companies Balance Scale and Profit When Expanding Overseas? **Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily, April 7 News (Reporters Li Yu and Wang Chufan)** At present, energy security and low-carbon transition are resonating together, and Chinese energy storage companies are accelerating their overseas expansion. Since this year began, on the one hand, the global energy storage industry chain has been speeding up reconstruction, and domestic leading energy storage enterprises are accelerating their overseas localization by setting up manufacturing plants; on the other hand, Chinese energy storage companies’ overseas order volume and growth rate are impressive. The industry’s logic for going global has moved from exporting a single product to a deeper globalized upgrade in which production capacity, technology, and standards are coordinated and exported. Emerging markets such as the Middle East and Latin America have even become new driving forces for global energy storage growth. Meanwhile, behind the acceleration of Chinese energy storage companies going overseas, issues such as industry profitability and compliance risk also need attention. How to balance scale and profit, and address problems such as localization risk, remains a core question for companies over the long term. **▍Supply Side: Chinese Energy Storage Companies Are Clustering to Set Up Plants Overseas for Localization** **Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters note that since this year began, Chinese energy storage companies have been accelerating their clustering to head overseas to land projects and build factories.** Specifically, **in Europe,** in March this year, Haisan Energy Storage completed the signing of a letter of intent with the Spanish government and plans to invest about 400 million euros (about RMB 3.181 billion) to build a large-scale battery and energy storage systems manufacturing plant. This factory focuses on the production of lithium iron phosphate battery cells and containerized energy storage system solutions, and is planned to commence operations in 2027. In February this year, Sungrow announced it would invest in Europe to build its first manufacturing plant, with a total investment of 230 million euros (about RMB 1.829 billion). The plant will have manufacturing capacity of 20GW of photovoltaic inverters and 12.5GWh of energy storage systems per year. Earlier, in January this year, CALB and the Portuguese government completed the signing of an investment contract. The company’s investment project is located in Sines, Portugal. It plans to build a lithium battery factory with a total investment of 2.067 billion euros (about RMB 16.440 billion). It is expected to be fully operational in 2028, and upon completion, it may have energy storage-related production capacity of 15GWh. **In emerging markets such as the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Africa,** in January this year, Sungrow signed a strategic cooperation agreement with the Egyptian government and Norwegian renewable energy company Scatec. The three parties will jointly advance a clean energy project with a total investment of more than $1.8 billion. This cooperation includes Sungrow investing in and building a plant in the Suez Canal Economic Zone. It is worth noting that, according to disclosures in Sungrow’s annual report, in 2025, the revenue share of the company’s energy storage systems was 41.81%, exceeding for the first time its photovoltaic inverter and other power-electronics conversion equipment. In the same period, the company’s revenue from overseas regions was RMB 53.992 billion, up 48.76% year over year, benefiting from its expansion into overseas markets for its energy storage business. Also in January this year, Tuo Neng New Energy signed strategic cooperation agreements with WeaCan and Kemet in Egypt. It plans to supply, in phases, a total of 6GWh of energy storage system products to Egypt and announced that it will co-build an energy storage battery factory with Kemet. The project’s total investment is $200 million (about RMB 1.377 billion), with a planned annual capacity of 5GWh. Tuo Neng New Energy’s president Huang Feng said, “In the next 2–3 years, we will deeply cultivate overseas markets to achieve global development. The company is involved not only in energy storage, but will also expand into other power-related products.” **In the U.S. market,** specifically, in January this year, Longi Green Energy was reported to have formed a joint venture with precision energy company and a U.S. lithium battery supplier NeoVolta. The joint venture is NeoVolta Power, LLC. It also plans to build a production base for battery energy storage systems in Pendergrass, Georgia, in the United States. In response, industry insiders analyzed to Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters that the U.S. energy storage market demand is clear because factors such as outdated and weak traditional grid infrastructure, plus the growth in data center demand and the reshoring of local manufacturing capacity, are driving it. At present, companies such as Longi Green Energy and Autohes are exploring diversified and innovative paths through optimization of operating models and integration of resources, aiming to deepen their cultivation of the U.S. energy storage market. Gao Chengyuan, head of the Zhancang Influence Research Institute, analyzed to Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters that, for example, in the case of photovoltaic companies, they enhance pricing premium capability by building plants overseas, adopting integrated PV-plus-storage solutions, and positioning high-end product development. Lithium battery companies are accelerating “capacity going overseas,” reducing risks related to trade barriers through localized production and capital operations. **▍Demand Side: Emerging Markets Are Becoming New Momentum for Global Energy Storage Growth** **Looking back at all of 2025,** according to CNESA DataLink’s global energy storage database (incomplete statistics), in 2025 Chinese energy storage companies added overseas orders totaling 366GWh, up 144% year over year. Orders covered more than 60 countries and regions worldwide, and there were more than 70 Chinese energy storage companies going overseas. Core enterprises such as CATL, Sungrow, BYD, and Habo S 创 are accelerating their overseas expansion plans, with their business reaching key markets including Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, North America, and the Middle East. **And this momentum continued into 2026.** Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters noted that since the beginning of this year, Chinese energy storage companies have continued to see a surge in orders in overseas markets. Customs data show that in January–February this year, China’s inverter exports amounted to $1.66 billion, up 56% year over year. According to data from the China Association of Automotive Power Battery Innovation, in the first two months of this year, China’s cumulative exports of power and energy storage batteries reached 48GWh, up 24.6% year over year. Among them, cumulative exports of energy storage batteries were 13.5GWh, accounting for 28% of total exports. Also according to statistics from GCLP PV & Energy Storage, in January–February this year, Chinese energy storage companies secured nearly 50 orders overseas, with a total scale of more than 33.5GWh, up more than 45% year over year. The orders covered Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia. **Behind these impressive export “performance reports,” a deeper trend has become evident: Chinese energy storage companies are accelerating their shift from exporting single products to an all-round globalized layout featuring capacity localization, technology export, and co-building standards.** In the view of Pengneng Technology’s CEO Tan Wen, as the industry chain gradually matures, market demand is also shifting from single products to diversified and integrated energy storage solution offerings. Therefore, most energy storage companies going overseas will experience role evolution—from energy storage equipment suppliers to energy storage solution providers, and then to energy operators. **Overall, in the current global energy storage market,** China, the U.S., and Europe are expanding from a three-way dominance into broader regions; China has ranked first globally for four consecutive years in new installed capacity; and emerging markets have become new momentum for global energy storage growth. At the recent 14th International Energy Storage Summit and Exhibition, Chen Haisheng, chairman of the board of the Zhongguancun Energy Storage Industry Technology Alliance and director of the Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that as of the end of 2025, the cumulative installed capacity of global power energy storage already in operation was 496.2GW, with a year-on-year growth rate of 33.4%. The energy storage industry is facing a new situation of win-win cooperation worldwide. Global supply chain systems are accelerating their reshaping, shifting from prioritizing “globalization efficiency” to prioritizing “regionalized security.” The trend toward globalized, diversified, and full-lifecycle planning is clear. Among them, emerging markets are accelerating their rise and becoming new momentum for global energy storage growth. Specifically, in the Middle East, the construction of large-scale new energy bases is driving rapid growth in energy storage demand. In Latin America, system regulation pressure brought by a high proportion of renewable energy is pushing the energy storage market to expand faster. In Asia’s emerging markets, grid stability and rising power demand, along with policy support in multiple countries, are accelerating project implementation. In Africa, safe electricity supply and demand for renewable energy grid integration have become the main drivers. Fang Yi, chief strategy analyst at Cathay Haitong Securities, believes that the essence of Chinese companies going overseas is, under the backdrop of a new global round of industry chain transfer, the process of Chinese industry occupying high value-added segments of the industry chain and moving toward deep globalization. Chinese companies are moving from product exports toward a system-level “capacity + brand + channels” overseas expansion, achieving a jump to high value-added segments at both ends of the “smile curve.” **▍Behind Chinese Energy Storage Companies Accelerating Their Overseas Expansion: Note These Tests and Risks** **Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters note that** currently, leading Chinese energy storage enterprises are no longer blindly pursuing scale expansion, but are placing more emphasis on selecting and focusing on high-gross-margin markets. This also means that competition in overseas high-gross-margin markets may intensify. Atters (Autohes) told Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters that “the development of the large-scale BESS market in Europe is relatively fast and has become a core support for the company’s overseas business. Atters adheres to a profit-first strategy and focuses on high-gross-margin markets such as Japan, Europe, and Canada.” According to a disclosure by Atters in March this year, as of December 31, 2025, Atters Energy Storage (e-STORAGE) had signed contracted orders on hand with an amount of $3.6 billion (about RMB 25.70 billion). In a research briefing disclosed by Longi Green Energy in January this year, the company admitted frankly that it is conducting detailed sorting of market regions for the development of its energy storage business and further planning. “The domestic market and overseas European market, U.S. market, and Australian market will be the phased key markets for Longi Energy Storage’s business development.” **Meanwhile,** Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters found that some investors have raised concerns about whether the low gross margins in China’s domestic energy storage market would be transmitted to overseas markets. Recently, Sungrow ran into the above question when receiving investor research. In response, the company said that on the supply side, it signs long-term cooperation agreements with core cell suppliers. Relying on the advantages of large-scale procurement, it can lock in cell prices within a certain period, and the price is clearly more competitive than the market. On the technology side, the company each year continues to reduce costs through various methods including technological innovation and supply chain coordination. On the client side, although price negotiations with customers are quite painful, we will keep working hard to ensure price transmission, and overall, customers recognize the value to us and our past service capabilities. “We believe the overall overseas situation can basically remain stable.” **Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters also learned that currently, Europe has put forward higher requirements for localized production.** Among them, in its annual report, Penge Neng Technology stated: in the future, it is not excluded that relevant countries or regions may change their import trade policies and product certification requirements for lithium battery energy storage products, which may in turn have adverse effects on the company’s operations. The company will continue to build localized organizational structures in its target markets overseas to reduce the impact of trade barriers on its operating performance. **In addition, in recent years,** periodic adjustments in demand in the residential energy storage market have caused significant differences across regions in overseas markets. According to CNESA statistics, based on the scale of newly added residential energy storage installations in typical regions from 2020 to 2025, Europe has seen a decline, while Australia has surged sharply. Going overseas is an essential path that Chinese energy storage companies cannot avoid, and opportunities and challenges coexist. How to stand firm in the wave of globalization, steadily expand market presence, and go to broader overseas markets remains a core issue that relevant companies need to cultivate deeply over the long term. (The Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily intern Dai Jiayi also contributed to this article.) (Science and Technology Innovation Board Daily reporters Li Yu and Wang Chufan)
0
0
0
0
MoneyBurnerSociety

MoneyBurnerSociety

14 hours ago
Recently, I've seen many newcomers discussing the history of DeFi, and I think it's necessary to review those painful lessons. Speaking of the frenzy of DeFi Summer, the period from 2020 to 2021 was truly crazy. I remember projects like UNI and SUSHI attracting a large number of retail investors with high APY liquidity mining, and everyone was desperately mining. But what was the problem? The project teams and big players had already set up the game—they controlled LPs, pre-constructed positions, and harvested most of the profits. Later, when the mining pools were shut down or migrated by the project teams, retail liquidity was trapped, and many people lost everything. This reminds me of the Black March 12 event in 2020. Bitcoin plummeted from over $9,000 to around $3,800, nearly a 50% drop in 24 hours. Ethereum also fell to $88. That day, global financial markets crashed, the entire crypto market experienced four circuit breakers, and liquidations in DeFi lending were devastating beyond imagination. During that period, interestingly, some people's choices were completely different. For example, industry insider Wang Yishi bought hardware wallets during the market crash, starting to hold BTC long-term for the bull market. Hardware wallets became a hedge tool for many, as people withdrew their coins from exchanges and smart contracts for cold storage. This approach contrasted sharply with those rushing to mine during DeFi Summer. There were also veteran miners like Li Xiaolai and Zhao Dong, who made a fortune during the bull market by holding coins, OTC trading outside exchanges, and investing in projects. Rumors of figures like "$70 million" are actually just their holdings or single-profit positions at certain stages. Their logic was simple: early positioning and off-exchange harvesting. Returning to the tactics of DeFi Summer, the most common method used by project teams was to move away the mining pools. They initially attracted retail liquidity with high APY, and once a large amount of capital entered, they suddenly shut down rewards or migrated LP pools. Users' provided liquidity was trapped, the project’s market cap collapsed, and the team completed their harvest. This pattern was repeated countless times during DeFi Summer. Looking back now, what has DeFi Summer taught us? High returns always come with risks—it's essential to ask where those risks are. Many people paid a heavy tuition during that wave, but it’s these experiences that made later participants more cautious.
0
0
0
0