- A critical trend has resurfaced online about California’s SB822, legislation that added crypto assets to the state’s unclaimed property framework and provided a system to inform asset owners to claim their assets within a given timeframe or have them transferred to the state
- Many critics claim the move was a desperate attempt by the state to siphon off more funds from residents, since they have only a fixed allocation from the Federal Reserve Bank.
Critics Decry Law as Unfair and Unconstitutional
In October, 2025, California made a pioneering move by becoming the first state to pass legislation that prevents the state’s Comptroller of the Currency from auctioning its residents’ crypto assets without properly notifying them to claim. While many saw it as a massive success in advancing the legitimacy of cryptocurrency and protecting consumer rights, a new group of critics calls it out as a retrogressive and anti-crypto effort.
Per the legislation, digital assets within the custody of exchanges and other such custodians are liable to be claimed by the state if the “apparent owner” does not claim it three years from the date they last indicated interest in the asset.
Others called it “criminal” and unconstitutional, citing how unfair it is to the average Californian to have their savings escheated to the state over inactivity within just three years.
ADVERTISEMENT## Viral Post Sparks Confusion Over Already-Enacted Crypto Legislation
Most of the backlash against the unclaimed properties legislation appears to stem from a controversial post, in which the poster, a reputable industry voice, assumed that the bill had just passed the House and was on its way to the Senate. The only bill that accorded the state the right to claim crypto assets was enacted in 2025.
Additionally, the state does not outrightly seize dormant assets after the 3-year deadline. If it first reaches out to the owners via exchanges between six and twelve months before the asset becomes reportable to the Controller as unclaimed.
Owners who fill out and sign an attached form will be considered active and have their escheating period recycled, while those who fail to respond to their exchanges’ messages will have their funds reported as dormant.
ADVERTISEMENTEven when funds have been transferred to the state, they are held in custody for the rightful owner, not permanently confiscated. A valid proof of ownership would directly earn back the heir’s crypto if it’s still held in its original form.
If the state has already converted the crypto to cash—which is possible within 18 to 20 months—the rightful owner receives the cash equivalent. In both cases, the owner is entitled to any interest on their funds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Pakistan Lifts an Eight-Year Ban: Central Bank Allows Banks to Serve Crypto Businesses, and the Virtual Assets Law Takes Effect
On April 14, 2026, the State Bank of Pakistan lifted its crypto-assets banking ban that has been in place since 2018, officially kicking off the Virtual Assets Act 2026. Banks may open accounts for licensed virtual asset service providers, but must establish a segregation-of-funds mechanism to ensure that customers’ funds are not affected. This policy change responds to domestic demand and demonstrates Pakistan’s growing role on the international stage.
ChainNewsAbmedia6h ago
The central bank issues a digital currency report—does it directly refute Qu Bo? If Taiwan issues a CBDC, merchants generally cannot refuse to accept it
The central bank released a report stating that Taiwan’s CBDC development will follow a phased promotion strategy. In the short term, it is not urgent to issue retail CBDC; the focus is on wholesale CBDC and the infrastructure for asset tokenization. The central bank emphasized that CBDC will not increase the money supply and will have legal standing. As a rule, merchants may not refuse to accept it, in order to prevent the payment market from becoming overly dependent on the private sector.
ChainNewsAbmedia8h ago
White House Report Challenges Stablecoin Yield Ban, CLARITY Act Advances in Senate
A White House report argues against banning stablecoin yields, highlighting minimal benefits for bank lending and reduced consumer earnings. Key officials support the CLARITY Act, but the Senate Banking Committee's timeline remains uncertain, affecting the bill's chances before summer recess.
GateNews9h ago
Criticized for freezing too slowly: USDC freezes are taking too long! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for a court order before freezing; we refuse to freeze it on our own
Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses unless it receives a court order or law-enforcement requirement. Even amid allegations of hacker money laundering and community backlash, Circle continues to insist on operating under the rule of law.
Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line
-----------------------------
As the global cryptocurrency market surges with uncertainty, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire, at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, made a clear stance on the market’s most sensitive issue of “asset freezes.” He noted that while Circle has technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or an official directive from law-enforcement agencies, the company will not
CryptoCity9h ago
Can bypass FSC regulations on using credit cards to buy crypto? OdinTing introduces the Wallet Pro service for buying crypto with a U.S. debit card
The OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by OdinTin use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and—by partnering with major international payment players—showcase its ambitions for expansion in the fintech sector. By operating from overseas, OdinTin bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, providing fast virtual-asset trading. Meanwhile, as it faces the newly promulgated Virtual Asset Services Act, it is set to become a reference template for other foreign-invested companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity10h ago
CLARITY Act Dropped From Senate Schedule; Crypto Bill Faces May Deadline to Avoid 2030 Delay
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott has delayed advancing the CLARITY Act due to unresolved issues, including stablecoin disputes and DeFi provisions. With a critical May deadline approaching, the bill's future remains uncertain amid political challenges.
GateNews12h ago
