FBI Director Admits Spending Money to Buy "Location Data" to Track American Citizens! Blasted for Trampling Fourth Amendment

FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that the FBI is currently purchasing “location data” from commercial entities to track American citizens, without the need for search warrants. Senator Ron Wyden criticized this as a “disturbing evasion of the Fourth Amendment” and warned that combining AI with location data could lead to widespread abuse.
(Background: FBI hacking incident! Chinese hacker group “Salt Typhoon” exposes Trump’s privacy?)
(Additional context: Bitcoin users “are being hijacked weekly,” experts warn that centralized exchange KYC leaks are the main cause)

On Tuesday (the 18th), FBI Director Kash Patel appeared at the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing and directly admitted, in response to Democratic Senator Ron Wyden’s questioning, that the FBI is buying commercial location data from data brokers to track U.S. citizens’ movements, completely without court search warrants.

This is the first public acknowledgment of this practice by the FBI since 2023. The previous director had testified before Congress that “to my knowledge, the FBI does not currently purchase commercial databases containing location data,” but Patel’s testimony completely overturns that statement.

At the hearing, Patel was straightforward:

“The FBI uses all tools, Senator, thank you for the question, to do our mission.”

“We do purchase commercially available information that’s consistent with the Constitution and the laws under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — and it has led to some valuable intelligence for us.”

Senator Slams: AI Combined with Location Data Is Mass Surveillance

Senator Ron Wyden pressed Patel on whether he could commit to stopping the purchase of location data, but was refused. Wyden criticized this as a “disturbing evasion of the Fourth Amendment.”

Wyden later told Gizmodo, “Building profiles of American citizens using AI based on this data is a terrifying expansion of mass surveillance.”

He then co-sponsored the Government Surveillance Reform Act, which clearly states that before federal agencies purchase any data from commercial entities, they must first obtain a court-issued search warrant. If passed, this law would directly close the loophole allowing the FBI to bypass the Fourth Amendment.

Core of the Controversy

Also present was Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Senate Intelligence Committee Chair and Republican Senator Tom Cotton defended the FBI, claiming that the data obtained is publicly available information, “similar to legally rummaging through trash.”

However, the legal controversy centers on the fact that these location data are not truly “public.” Data brokers collect precise location information from mobile apps, games, weather apps, and more, then package and sell it to government agencies.

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution explicitly protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. When the government “buys” data to bypass search warrants, it essentially turns constitutional protections into a bypassable loophole.

It’s important to note that this issue isn’t limited to the FBI. During the hearing, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) was also questioned about similar purchasing practices, indicating that such methods may be widespread within the U.S. intelligence community.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

SEC Crypto Shift Clarifies Rules Without Blanket Approval

The SEC has adopted a more lenient stance on crypto regulation, allowing some interfaces to operate without broker-dealer registration, but has not given blanket approval for the industry. Recent guidance clarifies how crypto assets are categorized, emphasizing that federal securities laws apply mainly to digital securities. Enforcement activity has decreased as the agency focuses on fraud and market integrity.

CryptoFrontier4h ago

Polish lawmakers want to overturn the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency bill but failed again in their latest attempt to push it through.

Poland’s parliament failed to override the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency regulatory bill, stalling the process of digital-asset legislation and making it one of the few countries in the EU that has not yet implemented the MiCA framework. Differences between the president and the government over the bill’s content led to a political stalemate, affecting market confidence and legal transparency.

ChainNewsAbmedia5h ago

Polish Parliament Fails to Override President's Veto on Crypto Law; PM Alleges Russian Interference

Polish lawmakers failed to override President Nawrocki's veto on a cryptocurrency regulation bill aimed at aligning with EU standards. Tensions rise as accusations emerge of Russian influence in a major crypto exchange amid liquidity issues and lack of regulation.

GateNews7h ago

White House Mediates Clarity Act Stablecoin Dispute, Witt Reveals Legislative Timeline

Patrick Witt announced at the Solana Policy Institute summit that the White House mediated a stablecoin dispute to advance the Clarity Act. The compromise allows banks and crypto firms to together address regulatory concerns, with future focus on crypto taxation and blockchain integration strategies among financial institutions.

GateNews14h ago

Hong Kong SFC Investment Committee Warns Prediction Market Trading May Constitute Illegal Gambling

The Hong Kong SFC warns that prediction markets are speculative and not investment products, lacking regulatory protection. They involve gambling elements, potentially making them illegal. The committee urges the public to differentiate between investment and gambling.

GateNews16h ago

Economist Proposes National USD Stablecoin to Eliminate Currency Controls in Venezuela

Alejandro Grisanti, head of Ecoanalitica, proposed issuing a national USD stablecoin as part of a series of measures to lift currency controls in Venezuela. This system would complement the current auction system, allowing the excluded sector to receive dollars via blockchain rails. Key

Coinpedia18h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments