Trudeau: U.S., Europe pressure nearly pushed Canada toward China

CryptoFrontier

Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday that Canada came close to moving toward China after economic pressure from the U.S. and Europe boxed in Canadian companies, speaking at CNBC’s CONVERGE LIVE in Singapore. Trudeau linked the warning to Bombardier, the Canadian aircraft maker, saying Western allies “almost drove” Canada “into China’s arms” through competitive pressure on the company’s C Series commercial jet.

Bombardier and Chinese Investment

Trudeau said Bombardier, which began building the C Series in 2008, struggled to reach airline buyers because Airbus in Europe and Boeing in the United States were leaning against it. He said Chinese investors then showed up with what he called a “dump truck full of money” to buy into the business. According to Trudeau, Boeing and Airbus were trying to crush Bombardier because they did not want a real rival, and that pressure nearly pushed Canada toward Chinese money to protect jobs.

Trudeau said Chinese investors offered a partnership in 2015 after talks over a possible Airbus merger collapsed. He said Bombardier looked again to China in 2017 after discussions with Boeing over the C Series failed.

G7 Summit and Trade Complaints

Trudeau said he took that complaint straight to leaders at the G7 summit in Sicily in 2017. He said he told Emmanuel Macron, Angela Merkel, and Trump that their actions were forcing Canada into Chinese hands to protect Canadian jobs, adding that Chinese investors were ready to pay whatever it took to get the asset.

Trudeau also said Canada later signed agreements with Europe to supply aluminum after the U.S. imposed a 50% tariff on imports of the metal. He said the constant risk of more tariffs pushed Canada to find better partners and get around what he described as economic coercion.

At the same Singapore event, Trudeau widened the attack beyond trade fights. He said major powers, naming the U.S., China, Russia, and India, had decided they could “opt in or opt out of pieces of the rules-based order.”

Current USMCA Negotiations

Prime Minister Mark Carney took a harder public line on the coming review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA. Carney said Wednesday that Canada was not a supplicant and would not let the U.S. dictate the terms of the review. The three countries are supposed to finish that work by July 1, but the schedule has been disrupted by tensions following Trump’s imposition of tariffs last year on key imports from Canada.

Carney said those tariff measures showed why Canada must cut its heavy dependence on the U.S. market. Trump has complained that USMCA, which supports a large part of Canada’s economy, is unfair to the United States. Carney pushed back, telling reporters: “It’s not a case where there is someone making demands, and a supplicant. It’s not a case that the United States dictates the terms. We have a negotiation, we can come to a mutually successful outcome – it will take some time.”

In Washington, Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that unless Canada agreed to talks on broader rules of origin, the rules that let goods enter the United States without tariffs, Washington might need other border controls. Former Quebec premier Jean Charest, who advises Carney on Canada-U.S. economic ties, told Radio-Canada that Washington wanted “a lot of concessions from Canada” before formal bilateral talks even started.

Tariff Response and Trade Impact

Mexico has already completed two rounds of talks with the U.S., and those two countries will hold their first formal negotiating round next month. No date has been set for talks with Canada. Carney said there were contacts at many levels with U.S. officials and that both sides had irritants they wanted fixed.

Canada responded to the U.S. tariffs with countermeasures, several provinces pulled U.S. alcohol from sale, official data showed that Canadian trips to the United States fell 22% in 2025, and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told a Senate hearing that it was “outrageous” that Canada would not put U.S. spirits on store shelves.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
GateUser-173efae5vip
· 1h ago
This statement is quite realistic; being caught between China, the U.S., and Europe is too difficult.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ffe7bee5vip
· 2h ago
The lesson from Bombardier's being blockaded was so profound that once the supply chain gets bottlenecked, they can only look for alternative markets.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletUnderTheAuroravip
· 2h ago
CNBC is discussing this, as if they are looking for an explanation for the decisions made back then, and also giving a warning to the current government.
View OriginalReply0
SudoSagevip
· 2h ago
Whether close to China or not is not important; what matters is whether you can hold key technologies, orders, and supply chains in your own hands.
View OriginalReply0
PettyLpvip
· 2h ago
When the US and Europe apply pressure, companies get "boxed in"; this kind of alliance politics is actually quite ironic for the market economy.
View OriginalReply0
NonceCollectorvip
· 2h ago
Canada, as a medium-power country, faces the most awkward situation: wanting to pursue independent diplomacy, but security and markets are both tied down.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityTeaMastervip
· 2h ago
If Bombardier's financing and market conditions hadn't been constrained back then, they might not have reached that point; external pressure was too real.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-af0710bavip
· 2h ago
Canada's desire to "get closer to China" seems more like a passive choice; when squeezed by the US and Europe, companies have to survive.
View OriginalReply0
MossyLedgervip
· 2h ago
Trudeau's example of Bombardier is quite accurate: in high-end manufacturing like aerospace, once market and capital support are lost, turning to anyone else is reasonable.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecoveryCoachvip
· 2h ago
This also indicates that companies need to implement multilateral backups for internationalization and avoid putting all their eggs in one basket.
View OriginalReply0
View More