ARM

Arm Holdings Price

ARM
$161,50
+$0,36(+%0,22)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-15 11:06 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-15 11:06, Arm Holdings (ARM) is priced at $161,50, with a total market cap of $171,21B, a P/E ratio of 141,57, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $160,00 and $163,00. The current price is %0,93 above the day's low and %0,92 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 6,25M. Over the past 52 weeks, ARM has traded between $100,02 to $183,16, and the current price is -%11,82 away from the 52-week high.

ARM Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$157,58
Market Cap$171,21B
Volume6,25M
P/E Ratio141,57
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Diluted EPS (TTM)0,75
Net Income (FY)$792,00M
Revenue (FY)$4,00B
Earnings Date2026-05-06
EPS Estimate0,58
Revenue Estimate$1,46B
Shares Outstanding1,08B
Beta (1Y)3.338

About ARM

Arm Holdings plc architects, develops, and licenses central processing unit products and related technologies for semiconductor companies and original equipment manufacturers rely on to develop products. It offers microprocessors, systems intellectual property (IPs), graphics processing units, physical IP and associated systems IPs, software, tools, and other related services. Its products are used in various markets, such as automotive, computing infrastructure, consumer technologies, and Internet of things. The company operates in the United States, the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, South Korea, and internationally. The company was founded in 1990 and is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom. Arm Holdings plc operates as a subsidiary of Kronos II LLC.
SectorTechnology
IndustrySemiconductors
CEORene Anthony Andrada Haas
HeadquartersCambridge,None,GB
Official Websitehttps://www.arm.com
Employees (FY)8,33K
Average Revenue (1Y)$481,03K
Net Income per Employee$95,07K

Learn More about Arm Holdings (ARM)

Arm Holdings (ARM) FAQ

What's the stock price of Arm Holdings (ARM) today?

x
Arm Holdings (ARM) is currently trading at $161,50, with a 24h change of +%0,22. The 52-week trading range is $100,02–$183,16.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Arm Holdings (ARM)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Arm Holdings (ARM)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Arm Holdings (ARM)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Arm Holdings (ARM)?

x

Should you buy or sell Arm Holdings (ARM) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Arm Holdings (ARM)?

x

How to buy Arm Holdings (ARM) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Arm Holdings (ARM) Latest News

2026-04-15 06:36

NVIDIA's Arm-Based PC Chip N1 Development Board Surfaces, Market Entry Imminent

Gate News message, April 15 — NVIDIA's N1 development board, an Arm-based system-on-chip (SoC) for Windows PCs co-developed with MediaTek since late 2024, has surfaced on a Chinese second-hand trading platform. The board features SK Hynix LPDDR5X memory modules and is priced at 9,999 yuan (approximately $1,370). The N1/N1X chips are believed to be derivatives of the GB10 used in NVIDIA's DGX Spark AI workstation, with clock speeds, memory bandwidth, and core counts adjusted for laptop environments. N1X integrates 10 high-performance Arm Cortex-X925 CPU cores, 10 power-efficient Cortex-A725 cores, and Blackwell GPU cores, aiming to enhance gaming and content creation capabilities on Arm-based Windows laptops. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang first mentioned the N1 chip in September last year during an announcement with Intel, stating it would be used in DGX Spark and similar products. The chip is expected to be officially unveiled during GTC 2026, held alongside Computex Taipei from June 1-4. Lenovo and Dell are reportedly preparing related product launches.

2026-04-10 06:31

SK Telecom teams up with Arm and Rebellions to develop an AI data center inference solution

Gate News message: On April 10, SK Telecom announced that it has signed a trilateral memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Arm, a UK chip design company, and South Korean AI chip startup Rebellions, to jointly develop AI data center inference server solutions. Under the agreement, the three parties will combine Arm’s newly released AGI CPU and Rebellions’ AI acceleration chip RebelCard, expected to be launched in the third quarter of this year, to jointly develop AI inference servers and to test and validate them at SK Telecom’s AI data center. Among them, the Arm AGI CPU is optimized for high-density inference environments and large-scale AI deployments, while RebelCard is designed specifically for large-scale AI inference.

2026-03-25 08:05

The Safest Middleman in the Chip Industry Takes the Most Dangerous Path

Between 4 billion dollars and 15 billion dollars, what lies between is not a growth curve but a self-revolution in business models. On March 24, Arm announced its first self-developed data center CPU in its 35-year history. Named AGI CPU, this chip features 136 Neoverse V3 cores, TSMC’s 3nm process, 300W TDP, with Meta as the first customer, planning large-scale deployment within the year. Also announced were collaborations with OpenAI, Cerebras, Cloudflare, SAP, and SK Telecom. Arm CEO Rene Haas provided a set of target figures at the launch, stating that the chip business aims to reach $15 billion in annual revenue by 2031, with the entire company’s total revenue at $25 billion and earnings per share of $9. What does this mean? Arm’s total revenue for FY2025 (ending March 2025) is $4.007 billion, according to Arm’s annual report, with licensing income of $1.839 billion and royalty income of $2.168 billion, and a gross margin of 97%. In other words, a company with $4 billion in annual revenue is expected to grow nearly to the scale of Intel’s entire data center division within five years based on a new business. According to Intel’s Q4 2024 financial report, Intel’s Data Center and AI (DCAI) division will generate $12.8 billion in revenue for 2024. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-b28ad97cef-f349f58fa5-8b7abd-ceda62) From $4 billion to $15 billion, a 3.7x leap, behind which is Arm’s attempt to transform from a pure IP licensing company into a hybrid that sells both design blueprints and finished products. This has no precedent in the chip industry. Why is Arm taking this risk? The answer lies in its customer list. Over the past three years, Arm’s largest data center clients have been doing the same thing. According to publicly available data from AWS, Amazon has migrated over 50% of its EC2 compute capacity to its self-developed Graviton chips, with the latest Graviton5 reaching 192 cores. Google Cloud disclosed that its Axion chips have migrated over 30,000 internal applications, improving efficiency by 80%. Microsoft’s Cobalt 200, based on Arm Neoverse architecture, uses TSMC’s 3nm process and has 132 cores. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-c5de4f78e1-d55712aa2b-8b7abd-ceda62) These cloud providers are using Arm architecture licenses, but the chips are designed, fabricated, and deployed by themselves. Arm earns licensing fees and royalties, not chip profits. As more computing power is absorbed by these self-developed chips, Arm’s revenue ceiling in data centers becomes increasingly clear. Looking at Arm’s revenue structure over the past four years, the outline of this ceiling becomes more concrete. According to Arm’s financial reports, from FY2022 to FY2025, the company’s total revenue grew from $2.7 billion to $4 billion, with an average annual growth of about 14%. Royalties increased from $1.562 billion to $2.168 billion, and licensing income from $1.141 billion to $1.839 billion. The growth rate of royalties has slowed to around 20%, largely driven by upgrades to the mobile Armv9 architecture, not data center developments. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-bc18c9e7b5-cd622fbbbf-8b7abd-ceda62) Extrapolating this growth rate, even if licensing and royalty income grow about 20% annually, the total would reach only around $10 billion by 2031. The remaining $15 billion must come from a new business that doesn’t yet exist today. This is the arithmetic behind Arm’s decision to build its own chips. Choosing to develop chips in-house essentially means competing with its own customers. A company that sells blueprints starts building its own buildings, while its blueprint buyers have been constructing for years. This is the real background of the 136-core AGI CPU. According to The Register, this chip has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz, up to 3.7 GHz, 12 DDR5 memory channels, 6 GB/s bandwidth per core, 96 PCIe 6.0 lanes, and supports CXL 3.0. Arm positions it as “the computing foundation for the agentic AI cloud era,” focusing on CPU-side task scheduling and data flow management in AI inference, not directly competing with GPUs. The pace of market share change also tells the story. According to Omdia, by 2025, Arm-based servers will account for about 21% of global shipments, with a 70% growth rate. But within hyperscale data centers, this share is already close to 50%. The 40-year monopoly of x86 isn’t collapsing but being replaced chip by chip. The risk of Arm’s self-developed chips isn’t technological but relational. Meta’s willingness to be the first customer is partly because Meta itself lacks a mature in-house chip project like Amazon or Google. But how will Amazon, Google, and Microsoft view this? If a supplier starts competing for your business, will you still entrust it with your most core architecture licensing? Arm’s gamble is that the overall growth of the data center market outpaces the deterioration of customer relationships. Rene Haas clearly believes that the incremental demand for CPUs in the AI era is large enough for self-developed chips and architecture licensing to coexist. The $15 billion target is a pricing of this judgment. Selling blueprints for 35 years, now building its own buildings for the first time. The blueprints are still being sold, and the buildings are being constructed—only whether they can fit on the same land remains to be seen. Click to learn more about Rhythm BlockBeats job openings. **Join the Rhythm BlockBeats official community:** Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats Telegram Group Chat: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App Twitter Official Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia

2026-03-25 00:16

OpenAI Foundation Plans to Invest $1 Billion in 2026, Focusing on AI Risk Prevention and Life Sciences

Gate News Report, March 25 — OpenAI plans to invest $1 billion this year through its nonprofit arm, the OpenAI Foundation, in various artificial intelligence-related initiatives. The OpenAI Foundation intends to focus its 2026 expenditures on helping society mitigate potential AI risks and funding efforts that leverage AI to advance life sciences. The foundation will invest through external grants and projects and has hired key figures such as Wojciech Zaremba and Jacob Trefethen to lead this nonprofit organization.

Hot Posts About Arm Holdings (ARM)

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

12 minutes ago
Just came across something pretty wild from OpenAI's early days. Turns out Elon Musk was actually on board with an ICO idea back in 2018 to help fund the organization. We're talking about a $10 billion token offering during the height of the ICO craze. According to internal notes that came out through legal filings, Musk and the OpenAI founders were seriously discussing how to set up a for-profit arm with an ICO structure to support the nonprofit's mission. This was January 2018, when everyone and their mom was launching tokens and raising insane amounts of money. The mechanics were apparently being worked out, and Musk seemed genuinely interested in the approach. But here's where it gets interesting—by the end of that month, Musk had already backed away from the whole thing. The reasoning? He figured OpenAI wouldn't be able to raise enough capital through an ICO anyway, so he pivoted his focus to AI work at Tesla instead. And not long after, he left OpenAI entirely. The whole episode is a fascinating window into how even mainstream tech figures were thinking about token-based fundraising at that moment. ICOs were absolutely everywhere in 2017-18 before regulators started cracking down and the market got way more volatile. Startups were raising billions by selling tokens directly to retail investors, and nobody really knew what the rules were going to be. What's interesting now is looking back at how seriously people considered the ICO model, even for a project like OpenAI. The fact that Musk entertained it, even briefly, shows how pervasive that thinking was. Of course, the organization ended up going a completely different route—combining a public benefit corporation with a controlling nonprofit, which is the structure they still use today. Meanwhile, completely separate story but kind of relevant to the crypto evolution: there's this company Bitmine Immersion Technologies that basically flipped from being a mining operation into running an Ethereum treasury strategy. They've doubled their share count in six months and accumulated nearly 5% of all ether. They're holding 4.87 million ether at an average cost of around $2,206 per token. Pretty wild to see how the industry has evolved from pure mining into these hybrid treasury plays.
0
0
0
0
TokenTherapist

TokenTherapist

3 hours ago
Just came across something interesting in the OpenAI legal filings that shows how wild the crypto landscape was back in 2018. Turns out Elon Musk actually backed a plan for OpenAI to raise around $10 billion through an ico, which is pretty wild when you think about where we are now. So here's what happened: early 2018, during the peak of the ico boom, Musk was apparently on board with the idea of creating a for-profit arm that would issue tokens to fund OpenAI's nonprofit mission. The internal notes show he was seriously discussing the mechanics of how this would work. But by the end of January that same year, he'd already pulled back. According to the docs, Musk concluded they couldn't raise enough through the ico route and decided to focus his energy on AI work at Tesla instead. What's fascinating is how this moment captures the entire crypto zeitgeist of 2017-18. Everyone was obsessed with ico fundraising back then, startups were raising billions by just dropping tokens directly to the public, and nobody really knew what the regulatory landscape would look like. It felt like the wild west compared to traditional venture capital. Even mainstream tech figures like Musk were seriously considering ico structures as a legitimate funding mechanism. Musk's exit from OpenAI later that year ended up shaping the whole organization differently. Instead of going the ico token route, they ended up building this hybrid model combining a public benefit corporation with a controlling nonprofit, which is still their structure today. Meanwhile, it's wild to see how the ico model has evolved. Speaking of transformations, I noticed Bitmine Immersion Technologies basically pivoted from pure mining into running a leveraged Ethereum treasury strategy. They've been aggressively accumulating ether and now hold nearly 5% of all ETH. That's a different kind of ico-era thinking adapted for today's market. The whole thing just reminds you how fast crypto narratives shift. What seemed like the future in 2018 gets abandoned, then different models emerge. Makes you wonder what we're currently betting on that'll look quaint in a few years.
0
0
0
0