ANTHROPIC

Anthropic Price

ANTHROPIC
$0
+$0(%0,00)
No data

*Data last updated: 2026-04-15 21:17 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-15 21:17, Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) is priced at $0, with a total market cap of --, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $0 and $0. The current price is %0,00 above the day's low and %0,00 below the day's high, with a trading volume of --. Over the past 52 weeks, ANTHROPIC has traded between $0 to $0, and the current price is %0,00 away from the 52-week high.

ANTHROPIC Key Stats

P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Shares Outstanding0,00

Learn More about Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)

Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) FAQ

What's the stock price of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) today?

x
Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) is currently trading at $0, with a 24h change of %0,00. The 52-week trading range is $0–$0.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

Should you buy or sell Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

How to buy Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) Latest News

2026-04-15 07:17

Anthropic Introduces Identity Verification for Claude to Prevent Abuse and Ensure Compliance

Gate News message, April 15 — Anthropic has rolled out an identity verification mechanism for certain use cases of Claude, aimed at preventing abuse, enforcing usage policies, and fulfilling legal obligations. The process is powered by Persona and requires users to submit a government-issued photo ID, with possible live selfie verification. Anthropic stated that verification data is used solely to confirm identity and will not be used for model training, marketing, or advertising. Users who fail verification can retry multiple times within the process or submit a form for manual assistance. Accounts may be suspended for repeatedly violating usage policies or terms of service, registering from unsupported regions, or being under 18 years of age.

2026-04-15 03:51

Anthropic Opposes Illinois AI Liability Bill Backed by OpenAI

Gate News message, April 15 — Anthropic is opposing Illinois bill SB 3444, which is backed by OpenAI. The bill would shield AI labs from liability for large-scale harm caused by misuse of their models, provided they draft and publish their own safety frameworks. Sources familiar with the matter said Anthropic has urged state senator Bill Cunningham and other lawmakers to change or drop the bill. Governor JB Pritzker's office stated he does not support giving big tech a full shield from responsibility. OpenAI said the measure would reduce risk and support a harmonized approach to state AI rules. Critics, including Thomas Woodside of Secure AI Project, argued the bill could nearly eliminate existing common law liability. Anthropic last week supported a separate Illinois bill that would require public safety plans and third-party audits for frontier AI developers.

2026-04-14 23:15

Cloud Startup Fluidstack in Talks to Raise $1B at $18B Valuation

Gate News message, April 14 — Fluidstack, a New York-based cloud infrastructure startup, is in talks to raise approximately $1 billion at a target valuation of $18 billion, according to people familiar with the matter. Jane Street and Situational Awareness are discussing co-leading the round, with Morgan Stanley serving as advisor. The company was valued at about $7.5 billion in an earlier funding round this year that included Situational Awareness. Fluidstack recently announced a $50 billion deal with Anthropic to build custom data centers. Fluidstack is a "neocloud" provider that supplies large clusters of GPUs to customers and works with partners to build dedicated computing capacity. Its expansion relies on former Bitcoin miners such as TeraWulf and Cipher Mining, which are converting power-intensive industrial sites into data centers. Google, an investor in Anthropic, has taken stakes in TeraWulf and Cipher. The $50 billion Anthropic deal signals a shift as AI firms move from renting standard cloud capacity to ordering custom-built infrastructure. This trend provides Bitcoin miners with a new revenue stream, helping them emerge from a profitability crisis by offering land and power for high-performance computing data centers. Cipher Mining and TeraWulf are pursuing long-term contracts for AI and HPC infrastructure to secure steadier cash flow than Bitcoin mining alone.

2026-04-14 06:01

Anthropic hires lobbying firm Ballard Partners, after talks with the Pentagon fell apart over AI use restrictions

Gate News message, on April 14, Anthropic has hired a lobbying firm, Ballard Partners, that is closely connected to the Trump administration. Relevant disclosure filings show that the cooperation took effect on March 9, a timing close to when the Pentagon issued its supply-chain risk determination for it. Reports say the core disagreement between the two parties in earlier negotiations falling apart was the scope of AI use. The Pentagon demanded unrestricted use of its tools, while Anthropic demanded that its products not be used for fully autonomous weapons deployment or large-scale surveillance targeting U.S. citizens. In addition, Ballard Partners is the sixth lobbying firm that Anthropic has hired since November 2024. Data shows that its 2025 federal lobbying spending increased year over year by more than 330% to about $3.1 million, reflecting a continued rise in policy-communication spending across the AI industry.

2026-04-14 04:16

Investors Question OpenAI’s $852 billion Valuation, Saying a Strategic Shift May Face Competitive Threats

Gate News message, on April 14, the Financial Times reported that OpenAI investors are questioning its $852 billion valuation, saying the company’s strategy is shifting. Some investors said these strategic changes could make OpenAI more vulnerable to threats from competitors such as Anthropic and Google.

Hot Posts About Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)

ChainSauceMaster

ChainSauceMaster

15 minutes ago
Just watched the Bittensor ecosystem implode in real-time. Covenant AI's three subnets just got nuked from orbit, and honestly, the story behind it is way messier than the price action suggests. So here's what went down. On April 10, Sam Dare—founder of Covenant AI—dropped a bombshell exit letter announcing they're pulling Templar, Basilica, and Grail subnets out of the Bittensor network. The market didn't take it well. TAO tanked over 15% in two hours, and the subnet tokens themselves got absolutely destroyed. SN3 down 57% in a day, SN39 and SN81 both down over 70%. This is brutal when you remember SN3 was up 460% just weeks earlier after they dropped Covenant-72B. But here's the thing—Covenant wasn't some random team. They'd just completed what might be the most ambitious decentralized LLM pre-training project the crypto space has ever seen. Over 70 nodes, each running 8 B200s, training a 72B parameter model on 1.1 trillion tokens. The model scored 67.1 on MMLU, which puts it in the ballpark of LLaMA-2-70B from 2023. Chamath called them out publicly, Jensen Huang paid attention, and even Jack Clark from Anthropic wrote about it in his research reports. That's legitimacy most crypto projects dream of. So why'd they leave? Sam's exit letter basically accuses Bittensor's core team—specifically Const (Jacob Steeves, co-founder)—of running a decentralization theater. The claims are specific: Const claims to have this 'triple multi-signature' governance structure but apparently shoots down any real power transfer. The subnet team says Const unilaterally suspended their emission distribution—basically cutting off their income stream. They also claim he forcibly removed their community channel moderation rights and even sold off tokens during their disputes as a pressure tactic. Const's response? Instead of point-by-point denials, he reframed the whole thing as an opportunity. He's talking about restarting an old governance proposal where alpha token holders could vote on-chain to select which teams run each subnet. Pretty clever move, honestly—he's pivoting from defense to 'let's evolve governance.' But he also took a direct shot at Sam: 'He clearly made this ugly decision out of malice and greed.' Then immediately shifted tone, saying this kind of thing happens and it's actually a chance for Bittensor to level up. The community split fast, but most voices landed against Covenant. The logic is straightforward—a team exits at peak hype, takes their tokens, leaves holders holding the bag. Classic rug pattern. Another subnet project called fish dropped receipts: Const apparently built the first versions of Grail and Templar himself, handed them to Sam, found him developers, donated startup TAO, even gave him 2000 TAO as a bonus one Christmas. According to fish, the actual trigger was Const selling about 5% of his personal holdings, which Sam apparently lost it over. Siam Kidd from DSV Fund, a Bittensor ecosystem hedge fund, called it bluntly: 'The subnet owners decided to cash out and leave. That's it.' He mentioned this mirrors how Nous Research exited before. He acknowledged some of Sam's decentralization critiques aren't entirely wrong—'Const does maintain significant control, I've said it myself'—but pushed back hard on the narrative: 'Const isn't power-hungry. Every action he takes is purely to help Bittensor.' What actually triggered the split? Apparently Sam had a Discord conflict, started deleting messages, Const revoked his deletion privileges, and then Const sold some alpha tokens. According to Siam, Sam just lost it over what should've been a minor thing. The bigger structural question though? This isn't unique to Bittensor. Every protocol claiming decentralization faces the same tension early on—founder influence way exceeds what any governance document can actually constrain. Const stepping down as CEO of Opentensor Foundation in February looked like a decentralization win, but Covenant's exit just exposed how much influence he still holds from the shadows. So what happens next? There's a 9% emission gap from these three subnets leaving. Other teams might compete for those positions, but whether they can replicate what Covenant built—the training data, model assets, contributor networks—is questionable. Covenant says they're taking their mission elsewhere and continuing on a new platform, but where? Will other leading subnets start questioning their position if governance disputes keep escalating? Currently there are 120+ active subnets in the ecosystem. And what about institutional players? Grayscale's TAO ETF is in application phase—this public governance crisis might make them pause. Const's on-chain voting mechanism for subnet team selection is the right direction, and he's also talking about tying subnet ownership to long-term economic commitment so investors can see token unlock schedules in advance. But can it actually get implemented fast enough under this pressure? That's the real test. The irony is that this whole blowup might actually force Bittensor to mature its decentralization narrative faster than it otherwise would have. Whether that happens or we just see more subnet teams heading for the exits—that's what I'm watching closely.
0
0
0
0