# 比特币网络升级

#比特币网络升级 Another round of anxiety marketing has begun. Seeing Nic Carter's long article about the threat of quantum computing, my first reaction was—I've seen this routine too many times.
Let's start with the facts: Jameson Lopp and Adam Back have a very clear-headed attitude; quantum computing won't threaten Bitcoin in the short term, and even if protocol modifications are necessary, they will take 5 to 10 years. This is the cautious attitude that should be taken. But Nic Carter? The companies invested in by his fund happen to be selling "quantum-resistant attack tools." What is this called?

#比特币网络升级 Regarding the ongoing discussion about the threat of quantum computing, I have compiled several key signals worth paying attention to:
**Time dimension is critical** — Jameson Lopp’s statement is clear: no worries in the short term, protocol modifications will take 5-10 years. This means the real threat is still far off, but the window for preparation is closing. The claim that 1.7 million BTC are at risk is indeed circulating, but it’s important to analyze the underlying interests—Nic Carter’s fund happens to have invested in anti-quantum tools companies. Such signals are common on-

#比特币网络升级 Saylor's words are worth pondering. His logic is actually the core principle I follow when choosing copy trading partners—**being conservative over aggressive, consensus over innovation**.
It reminds me of a previous aggressive trader I followed, who always thought about "optimizing strategies," "adding leverage," and "trying new methods." As a result, a black swan event directly wiped out the account. In contrast, those with stable returns are often refining their approach within their own framework and rarely making frequent changes. The upgrade logic of the Bitcoin protocol is act

#比特币网络升级 Recently, discussions about the risk of quantum attacks on Bitcoin have been quite interesting, with various voices in the community. Seeing the response from Bitcoin Core lead developer Jameson Lopp, I think this is the most rational attitude—neither overly pessimistic nor blindly optimistic.
Quantum computing is indeed a long-term concern, but there’s no need to panic in the short term. The real test is: if the quantum threat truly materializes, can the Bitcoin network complete upgrades and transformations within 5-10 years? This involves unprecedented challenges such as protocol m

#比特币网络升级 Recently studying the Bitcoin network upgrade, I came across a statement by Michael Saylor that felt quite enlightening 🤔
He means that Bitcoin upgrades cannot be changed arbitrarily; they must have the consensus of 8 billion people worldwide, especially considering changes only when quantum computing truly poses a threat. At first glance, it sounds a bit conservative, but upon reflection... does it actually make sense?
Since I just entered the crypto space and am not very familiar with protocol layer details, a metaphor suddenly helped me understand: giving a group of super-strong

#比特币网络升级 Here comes another big show 😂 Nic Carter says quantum computing will crack BTC, and 1.7 million Bitcoins will be gone. The result? Bitcoin Core developers directly slap back—short-term no worries, and the upgrade will take 5-10 years.
Honestly, I’ve heard this "wolf is coming" rhetoric too many times. Every time, someone stirs panic, and then certain projects just happen to have "solutions" to sell 🤔 Blockstream CEO even came out saying Carter exaggerated. This rhythm is all too familiar.
But on the other hand, a 5-10 year upgrade cycle is pretty crazy for Bitcoin. What does that m

#比特币网络升级 Seeing Michael Saylor's remarks on Bitcoin price potential, I was reminded of a question I’ve been discussing most with friends recently: why are some people always attracted to extreme predictions, yet overlook what truly matters.
Numbers like $1 million or $10 million are indeed eye-catching, but I care more about whether you've thought about how to allocate your positions behind these growth expectations. Michael Saylor’s perspective reflects a reality — institutions continue to favor the value of the Bitcoin network — but that doesn’t mean everyone should go all-in.
My experience

#比特币网络升级 The recent discussions about Bitcoin quantum attacks have been quite intense, with many people panicking upon seeing "1.7 million BTC at risk." However, according to Bitcoin Core developers, there's no need to worry in the short term — it will still take several years for quantum computers to crack Bitcoin, and it would only be necessary to modify the protocol for defense in about 5 to 10 years.
This is actually good news for us HODLers. First, it shows that Bitcoin's security is still reliable. Second, there won't be any major disruptions in the short term affecting interactions and