-
Draft bans stablecoin yield and interest-like features, blocking direct and indirect reward structures across platforms.
-
Allowed rewards include activity-based incentives, but must not depend on balances or resemble interest mechanisms.
-
SEC, CFTC, and Treasury will define rules and anti-evasion measures, shaping future stablecoin reward frameworks.
New legislative language tied to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act surfaced on March 23, 2026, outlining fresh restrictions on stablecoin yields and rewards. According to journalist Eleanor Terrett, industry leaders reviewed the draft the same day. The proposal aims to limit interest-like features on stablecoins while defining acceptable reward structures.
Yield Restrictions and Core Provisions
According to Eleanor Terrett, the draft would prohibit platforms from offering yield on stablecoins, both directly and indirectly. This includes any structure that resembles a bank deposit or functions like interest. The restriction applies broadly to digital asset service providers, including exchanges and brokers.
Additionally, the language bars any mechanism considered “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. This provision aims to prevent firms from bypassing the rule through alternative structures. As a result, platforms may face tighter controls on how they design financial products tied to stablecoins.
Permitted Rewards and Regulatory Oversight
However, the proposal allows certain activity-based rewards linked to user behavior. These include loyalty programs, promotions, and subscription-based incentives. Still, such rewards must not resemble interest or depend on balances or transaction amounts.
Furthermore, the draft directs the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury to define permissible rewards. These agencies must also establish anti-evasion rules within one year. This step introduces a coordinated regulatory framework for stablecoin-related incentives.
Industry Reaction and Legislative Context
Industry responses to the draft remain mixed. One leader described the proposal as a departure from earlier discussions with the White House. They noted that the “economic equivalence” standard may allow stricter interpretations by future regulators.
Another reviewer called the approach more restrictive overall, citing limits on reward structures. However, a separate industry participant said the draft aligns with expectations. They added that it preserves transaction-based incentives while preventing stablecoins from acting like interest-bearing accounts.
Meanwhile, the proposal expands beyond the earlier framework introduced by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks. Bank representatives are now set to review the draft, with further discussions expected ahead of the next legislative steps.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
BIS calls for globally coordinated stablecoin regulation: warns that Tether and Circle account for 85% of those showing “security-like characteristics”
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) once again emphasized the importance of global stablecoin regulatory coordination, pointing out three major risks that stablecoins face at this stage, including regulatory challenges related to cross-border flows and issues with market concentration. BIS proposed a unified ledger framework and argued that central banks need to lead the development of digital currencies, which would pose challenges to existing stablecoin issuers such as Tether and Circle. Overall, in the future, stablecoins may face a more stringent regulatory framework.
ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago
Hong Kong SFC Approves New Framework for Trading Tokenized Investment Products
Hong Kong's SFC introduced a regulatory framework for trading tokenized investment products, enabling secondary market trading on licensed virtual asset platforms and enhancing access for retail investors.
GateNews1h ago
Central Bankers Warn Stablecoins Risk Accelerating Dollarization in Emerging Markets
Central bankers warn that stablecoins may accelerate dollarization in emerging markets and pose financial crime risks due to weak regulatory oversight. They urge for international coordination on stablecoin standards to balance innovation with financial stability.
GateNews2h ago
Charles Schwab Explores Prediction Markets Tied to Financial Events Amid Regulatory Scrutiny
Charles Schwab is considering introducing prediction markets for financial events amid growing Wall Street interest, while maintaining a focus on wealth management. Regulatory scrutiny is increasing, especially regarding sports and entertainment wagers, highlighted by recent legislation and concerns over insider trading and market manipulation.
GateNews4h ago
CLARITY Bill dispute de-escalates, JPMorgan report: the draft legislation is nearing completion
A JPMorgan report says legislative negotiations on the U.S. 《CLARITY Act》 are nearing the end, with contentious issues reduced to just 2 to 3 items. The main focus is on DeFi regulation and token classification. The bill aims to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, covering issues such as stablecoin rules and the division of regulatory authority. Discussions about stablecoin yield are trending in a more optimistic direction, but the legislative timeline remains uncertain.
MarketWhisper5h ago
Moody’s: Stablecoins don’t pose a near-term threat to banks, but a $300 billion market cap reveals long-term risks
Moody’s Analytics said that stablecoins will not replace traditional bank deposits on a large scale in the near term, mainly because the United States’ payment infrastructure is mature and regulatory prohibitions limit their use. But as the stablecoin market capitalization rises, it could over the long term drive outflows from bank deposits and reduce banks’ ability to create credit. In addition, regulatory controversy around the CLARITY Act further increases uncertainty in the market.
MarketWhisper5h ago
